linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,  <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [Question] Is there race between swapoff and swapout
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:51:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgnih6gz.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8860e8b1-7bad-0b4a-60d1-4893973b9cb2@huawei.com> (Chen Wandun's message of "Mon, 14 Oct 2019 21:22:35 +0800")

Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com> writes:

> I analysied the code about swapoff and swapout, and I suspected there may be a race.
> The kernel version is 4.14 stable.
>
> CPU0						CPU1
> swapoff						swap out
> 						add_to_swap
> 							get_swap_page
> 	......							get_swap_pages						
> 									spin_lock(&swap_avail_lock)
> 									get swap_info_struct
> 									spin_unlock(&swap_avail_lock)		
> 	spin_lock(&swap_avail_lock)									
> 	__def_from_avail_list(swap_info_struct)								
>     	spin_unlock(&swap_avail_lock)					......	
> 	try_to_unuse  // unuse all slot
> 									/* get a free slot from swap_info_struct,
> 									 * and write data to slot later
> 									 */	
> 									scan_swap_map_slots
> 	free swap_info_struct
> 	.......
>
> 	
> If CPU1 get the swap_info_struct first, then CPU0 delete it from list and
> unuse all slot in swap_info_struct, before CPU0 free swap_info_struct CPU1
> call scan_swap_map_slots to alloc a free slot.
>
> I am not sure the analysis above is correct,
> Please let me know if there is any mistake

SWP_WRITEOK will be cleared during swapoff, and it is checked during
swap slots allocation.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> Thanks
> ChenWandun


      reply	other threads:[~2019-10-24  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-14 13:22 Chen Wandun
2019-10-24  8:51 ` Huang, Ying [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sgnih6gz.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=chenwandun@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox