From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA19AC433B4 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D0D61248 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:33:06 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 58D0D61248 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 8D1AF6B0080; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:33:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 880096B0081; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:33:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 7232C6B0082; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:33:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0135.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.135]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AAE6B0080 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 09:33:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin31.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD134DD8 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:33:05 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77983889130.31.2AFD9F9 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by imf12.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807C5135 for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:33:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1617283982; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HZjvyKpt+QXry8euYSSyT/r99M7FJN1MQXh9qXC4Ovc=; b=OH/CF4HibPXVGkUdfGd2pL1pUjUIF436O4FRK6nP0rQgDA27/0DbpRpklUSnYW6qo7N47Z bwGU896e+og2wjEMgi8YAD/XxNXlGeeySxLnCVqTq2swbV/WvxqlCDTQsnAFsIEuqKFjzE WcINh7uptDUpKxjulazD79npSLL2TFYdlt9Pdqf8pKMSwHfWPX/H1e0RdOnL4nH93SurQI nDy8RSI+Ffr8J1Jx0Cx2jYbd9ysbf4324yA1V8OKnDMRrn/NoZspWKlGuh2P+n/jco5yYQ OpJS6Bcofv4VluIdc8RKCDyT/Gu+YI3XTIRRnOKANzysJq+uW1E8m+Q7qGsd2A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1617283982; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HZjvyKpt+QXry8euYSSyT/r99M7FJN1MQXh9qXC4Ovc=; b=yG7k2QB1PDjKcVufvbc8qoQOxN5QwFy6nxDd8786TOEt1taaumoojXztjePOcCOmuF4672 o8XO9neOntE3BqBw== To: Will Deacon , Kees Cook Cc: Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , Elena Reshetova , x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Alexander Potapenko , Alexander Popov , Ard Biesheuvel , Jann Horn , Vlastimil Babka , David Hildenbrand , Mike Rapoport , Andrew Morton , Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Optionally randomize kernel stack offset each syscall In-Reply-To: <20210401083758.GA8745@willie-the-truck> References: <20210331205458.1871746-1-keescook@chromium.org> <20210401083758.GA8745@willie-the-truck> Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 15:33:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87sg4a3zap.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 807C5135 X-Stat-Signature: thdr64cqj7eckyczw1b64exuzrxim6s8 Received-SPF: none (linutronix.de>: No applicable sender policy available) receiver=imf12; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from=""; helo=galois.linutronix.de; client-ip=193.142.43.55 X-HE-DKIM-Result: pass/pass X-HE-Tag: 1617283983-879276 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 01 2021 at 09:37, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 01:54:52PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> Hi Will (and Mark and Catalin), >> >> Can you take this via the arm64 tree for v5.13 please? Thomas has added >> his Reviewed-by, so it only leaves arm64's. :) > > Sorry, these got mixed up in my inbox so I just replied to v7 and v8 and > then noticed v9. Argh! > > However, I think the comments still apply: namely that the dummy "=m" looks > dangerous to me > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401083034.GA8554@willie-the-truck Hrmpf, didn't think about that. > and I think you're accessing pcpu variables with preemption enabled > for the arm64 part: That's my fault. On x86 this is invoked right after coming up into C code and _before_ enabling interrupts, which I why I suggested not to use the wrapped one. raw_cpu_read() should be fine everywhere. Thanks, tglx