From: "Luís Henriques" <lhenriques@suse.de>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Freeing page flags
Date: Fri, 13 May 2022 10:40:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfpd22kq.fsf@brahms.olymp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yn3S8A9I/G5F4u80@casper.infradead.org> (Matthew Wilcox's message of "Fri, 13 May 2022 04:39:28 +0100")
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> writes:
> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:41:41PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 09:54:59PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> > The LWN writeup [1] on merging the MGLRU reminded me that I need to send
>> > out a plan for removing page flags that we can do without.
>> >
>> > 1. PG_error. It's basically useless. If the page was read successfully,
>> > PG_uptodate is set. If not, PG_uptodate is clear. The page cache
>> > doesn't use PG_error. Some filesystems do, and we need to transition
>> > them away from using it.
>> >
>>
>> What about writes? A cursory look shows we don't clear Uptodate if we fail to
>> write, which is correct I think. The only way to indicate we had a write error
>> to check later is the page error.
>
> On encountering a write error, we're supposed to call mapping_set_error(),
> not SetPageError().
>
>> > 2. PG_private. This tells us whether we have anything stored at
>> > page->private. We can just check if page->private is NULL or not.
>> > No need to have this extra bit. Again, there may be some filesystems
>> > that are a bit wonky here, but I'm sure they're fixable.
>> >
>>
>> At least for Btrfs we serialize the page->private with the private_lock, so we
>> could probably just drop PG_private, but it's kind of nice to check first before
>> we have to take the spin lock. I suppose we can just do
>>
>> if (page->private)
>> // do lock and check thingy
>
> That's my hope! I think btrfs is already using folio_attach_private() /
> attach_page_private(), which makes everything easier. Some filesystems
> still manipulate page->private and PagePrivate by hand.
In ceph we've recently [1] spent a bit of time debugging a bug related
with ->private not being NULL even though we expected it to be. The
solution found was to replace the check for NULL and use
folio_test_private() instead, but we _may_ have not figured the whole
thing out.
We assumed that folios were being recycled and not cleaned-up. The values
we were seeing in ->private looked like they were some sort of flags as
only a few bits were set (e.g. 0x0200000):
[ 1672.578313] page:00000000e23868c1 refcount:2 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000022e0d3b4 index:0xd8 pfn:0x74e83
[ 1672.581934] aops:ceph_aops [ceph] ino:10000016c9e dentry name:"faed"
[ 1672.584457] flags: 0x4000000000000015(locked|uptodate|lru|zone=1)
[ 1672.586878] raw: 4000000000000015 ffffea0001d3a108 ffffea0001d3a088 ffff888003491948
[ 1672.589894] raw: 00000000000000d8 0000000000200000 00000002ffffffff 0000000000000000
[ 1672.592935] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(1)
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220508061543.318394-1-xiubli@redhat.com/
Cheers,
--
Luís
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-13 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-12 20:54 Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-13 2:41 ` Josef Bacik
2022-05-13 3:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-13 9:40 ` Luís Henriques [this message]
2022-05-13 12:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-13 13:18 ` Luís Henriques
2022-05-13 13:21 ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-13 13:38 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-05-13 13:57 ` Jeff Layton
2022-05-17 0:34 ` Xiubo Li
2022-05-13 13:17 ` Josef Bacik
2022-05-13 3:46 ` Yu Zhao
2022-05-14 6:10 ` Eric Biggers
2022-05-23 6:38 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-06-10 17:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-05-30 16:54 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfpd22kq.fsf@brahms.olymp \
--to=lhenriques@suse.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox