From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com>,
Erhard Furtner <erhard_f@mailbox.org>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: OVERFLOW_KUNIT_TEST fails with BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in string_nocheck+0x168/0x1c8 (kernel 6.11-rc2, PowerMac G4 DP)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 22:00:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sev43cfq.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e40749be-5f0c-458f-8baa-c32f76491605@gmail.com>
Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com> writes:
> On 8/15/24 00:26, Ivan Orlov wrote:
>>
>> As you can see, the device name is defined as a local variable, which
>> means that it doesn't exist out of the 'overflow_allocation_test'
>> function scope. This patch:
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/overflow_kunit.c b/lib/overflow_kunit.c
>> index f314a0c15a6d..fa7ca8c94eee 100644
>> --- a/lib/overflow_kunit.c
>> +++ b/lib/overflow_kunit.c
>> @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ DEFINE_TEST_ALLOC(devm_kzalloc, devm_kfree, 1, 1, 0);
>>
>> static void overflow_allocation_test(struct kunit *test)
>> {
>> - const char device_name[] = "overflow-test";
>> + static const char device_name[] = "overflow-test";
>> struct device *dev;
>> int count = 0;
>>
>>
>> Seems to fix the problem and it is not reproducable anymore.
>>
>> I will send the proper patch tomorrow.
>>
>> Good night!
>>
>
> Forgot to mention that the problem is intermittently reproducible on
> QEMU x86_64, and this is the only architecture I tested the solution on.
>
> However, it looks like the initial report points us to
> 'module_remove_driver' function, which presumably calls the following
> kasprintf as a part of 'make_driver_name' function which also operates
> on driver name. If driver name points to invalid memory range (because
> it is out of scope), it is going to cause a KASAN bug kernel panic.
Nice catch.
I notice there's at least one other case that looks similar in
lib/fortify_kunit.c
cheers
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-16 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-09 21:15 Erhard Furtner
2024-08-12 18:54 ` Kees Cook
2024-08-14 20:38 ` Erhard Furtner
2024-08-14 23:26 ` Ivan Orlov
2024-08-14 23:58 ` Ivan Orlov
2024-08-16 12:00 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sev43cfq.fsf@mail.lhotse \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=erhard_f@mailbox.org \
--cc=ivan.orlov0322@gmail.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox