From: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru>,
Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
devel@openvz.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] incorrect error handling inside generic_file_direct_write
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:18:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87psapz1zr.fsf@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061212015232.eacfbb46.akpm@osdl.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:52:32 -0800")
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1433 bytes --]
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:20:52 +0300
> Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru> wrote:
>
>> > XFS (at least) can call generic_file_direct_write() with i_mutex not held.
>> > And vmtruncate() expects i_mutex to be held.
>> >
>> > I guess a suitable solution would be to push this problem back up to the
>> > callers: let them decide whether to run vmtruncate() and if so, to ensure
>> > that i_mutex is held.
>> >
>> > The existence of generic_file_aio_write_nolock() makes that rather messy
>> > though.
>> This means we may call generic_file_aio_write_nolock() without i_mutex, right?
>> but call trace is :
>> generic_file_aio_write_nolock()
>> ->generic_file_buffered_write() /* i_mutex not held here */
>> but according to filemaps locking rules: mm/filemap.c:77
>> ..
>> * ->i_mutex (generic_file_buffered_write)
>> * ->mmap_sem (fault_in_pages_readable->do_page_fault)
>> ..
>> I'm confused a litle bit, where is the truth?
>
> xfs_write() calls generic_file_direct_write() without taking i_mutex for
> O_DIRECT writes.
Yes, but my quastion is about __generic_file_aio_write_nolock().
As i understand _nolock sufix means that i_mutex was already locked
by caller, am i right ?
If yes, than __generic_file_aio_write_nolock() is beter place for vmtrancate()
acclivity after generic_file_direct_write() has fail.
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
-------
[-- Attachment #2: diff-generic-direct-io-write-fix --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 587 bytes --]
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 7b84dc8..723d2ca 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -2282,6 +2282,15 @@ __generic_file_aio_write_nolock(struct k
written = generic_file_direct_write(iocb, iov, &nr_segs, pos,
ppos, count, ocount);
+ if (written < 0) {
+ loff_t isize = i_size_read(inode);
+ /*
+ * generic_file_direct_write() may have instantiated
+ * a few blocks outside i_size. Trim these off again.
+ */
+ if (pos + count > isize)
+ vmtruncate(inode, isize);
+ }
if (written < 0 || written == count)
goto out;
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-12 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-11 13:34 Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-11 12:38 ` [Devel] " Kirill Korotaev
2006-12-11 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12 9:22 ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-12 6:36 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12 12:20 ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-12 9:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12 13:18 ` Dmitriy Monakhov [this message]
2006-12-12 10:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-12-12 23:14 ` Dmitriy Monakhov
2006-12-13 2:43 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-12-15 10:43 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2006-12-15 18:53 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2007-01-02 11:17 ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87psapz1zr.fsf@sw.ru \
--to=dmonakhov@sw.ru \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox