linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 21/23] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 23:26:19 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plrwj56s.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23f3fe9e8fe37cb164a369850d4569dddf359fdf.1719240269.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:
> On book3s/64, the only user of hugepd is hash in 4k mode.
>
> All other setups (hash-64, radix-4, radix-64) use leaf PMD/PUD.
>
> Rework hash-4k to use contiguous PMD and PUD instead.
>
> In that setup there are only two huge page sizes: 16M and 16G.
>
> 16M sits at PMD level and 16G at PUD level.
>
> pte_update doesn't know page size, lets use the same trick as
> hpte_need_flush() to get page size from segment properties. That's
> not the most efficient way but let's do that until callers of
> pte_update() provide page size instead of just a huge flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
> v3:
> - Add missing pmd_leaf_size() and pud_leaf_size()
> - More cleanup in hugetlbpage_init()
> - Take a page fault when DIRTY or ACCESSED is missing on hash-4 hugepage
>
> v4: Rebased on v6.10-rc1
>
> v6: Added a WARN_ON_ONCE() in hash__pte_update() in case the pagesize is unexpected.
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash-4k.h  | 15 ------
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hash.h     | 40 +++++++++++++---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/hugetlb.h  | 38 ---------------
>  .../include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable-4k.h        | 47 -------------------
>  .../include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable-64k.h       | 20 --------
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h  | 22 +++++++--
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/hugetlb.h            |  4 ++
>  .../powerpc/include/asm/nohash/hugetlb-e500.h |  4 --
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/page.h               |  8 ----
>  arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c         | 11 +++--
>  arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hugetlbpage.c        | 10 ++++
>  arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/pgtable.c            | 12 -----
>  arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlbpage.c                 | 26 ----------
>  arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c                     |  2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype        |  1 -
>  15 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 186 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable-4k.h

This looks good to me. I've run a few tests on it and haven't seen any
issues.

I also dumped the page tables of a test program and checked they looked
sensible. And I checked that the hash insert path is actually inserting
a huge page entry (of course it is, but just to be sure).

On mainline using a hugepd page hits the first warning in
try_grab_folio() (via gup_hugepd()) and hangs the process. I haven't
seen that reported (it goes back to v6.5), so my impression is hugepd on
hash-4k is essentially unused these days.

This series is an improvement on that, so let's get it into mm-unstable
for some wider testing.

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc)

cheers


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-02 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-24 14:45 [PATCH v6 00/23] Reimplement huge pages without hugepd on powerpc (8xx, e500, book3s/64) Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 01/23] powerpc/64e: Remove unused IBM HTW code Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 02/23] powerpc/64e: Split out nohash Book3E 64-bit code Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 03/23] powerpc/64e: Drop E500 ifdefs in " Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 04/23] powerpc/64e: Drop MMU_FTR_TYPE_FSL_E checks " Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 05/23] powerpc/64e: Consolidate TLB miss handler patching Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 06/23] powerpc/64e: Drop unused TLB miss handlers Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 07/23] mm: Define __pte_leaf_size() to also take a PMD entry Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 08/23] mm: Provide mm_struct and address to huge_ptep_get() Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 09/23] powerpc/mm: Remove _PAGE_PSIZE Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 10/23] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32 bits with PMD leaf entries Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 11/23] powerpc/mm: Allow hugepages without hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 12/23] powerpc/8xx: Fix size given to set_huge_pte_at() Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 13/23] powerpc/8xx: Rework support for 8M pages using contiguous PTE entries Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 14/23] powerpc/8xx: Simplify struct mmu_psize_def Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 15/23] powerpc/e500: Remove enc and ind fields from " Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 16/23] powerpc/e500: Switch to 64 bits PGD on 85xx (32 bits) Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 17/23] powerpc/e500: Encode hugepage size in PTE bits Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 18/23] powerpc/e500: Don't pre-check write access on data TLB error Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 19/23] powerpc/e500: Free r10 for FIND_PTE Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 20/23] powerpc/e500: Use contiguous PMD instead of hugepd Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 21/23] powerpc/64s: Use contiguous PMD/PUD instead of HUGEPD Christophe Leroy
2024-06-25  4:49   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-25  5:20     ` LEROY Christophe
2024-06-26  1:23       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-07-02 13:26   ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 22/23] powerpc/mm: Remove hugepd leftovers Christophe Leroy
2024-06-24 14:45 ` [PATCH v6 23/23] mm: Remove CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_HUGEPD Christophe Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87plrwj56s.fsf@mail.lhotse \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox