linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Regression caused by commit 4687fdbb805a ("mm/filemap: Support VM_HUGEPAGE for file mappings")
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:43:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plcw8lyq.fsf@linux.dev> (raw)

Hello!

The commit 4687fdbb805a ("mm/filemap: Support VM_HUGEPAGE for file
mappings") causes a regression in our production for containers
which are running short on memory. In some cases they are getting
stuck for hours in a vicious reclaim cycle. Reverting this commit
fixes the problem.

As I understand, the intention of the commit is to allocate large folios
whenever possible, and the idea is to ignore device-specific readahead
settings and the mmap_miss logic to achieve that, which makes total
sense.

However under a heavy memory pressure there must be a mechanism to
revert to order-0 folios, otherwise the memory pressure is inevitable
increased. Maybe mmap_miss heuristics should still be applied? Any other
ideas how to fix it?

Also, a side question: I wonder if it makes sense to allocate 1-2
PMD-sized folios if mapping_large_folio_support() is not there?

Thanks!


             reply	other threads:[~2025-08-15 18:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-15 18:43 Roman Gushchin [this message]
2025-08-15 21:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-15 22:12   ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-15 22:21     ` Roman Gushchin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87plcw8lyq.fsf@linux.dev \
    --to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox