From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com [209.85.220.52]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B176B0038 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 09:24:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by pacyx8 with SMTP id yx8so192934847pac.1 for ; Tue, 05 May 2015 06:24:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e23smtp04.au.ibm.com (e23smtp04.au.ibm.com. [202.81.31.146]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ci13si24300403pac.227.2015.05.05.06.23.58 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 May 2015 06:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp04.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 5 May 2015 23:23:54 +1000 Received: from d23relay10.au.ibm.com (d23relay10.au.ibm.com [9.190.26.77]) by d23dlp02.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC412BB004D for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 23:23:51 +1000 (EST) Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay10.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t45DNgVF46071932 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 23:23:51 +1000 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t45DNIRP003239 for ; Tue, 5 May 2015 23:23:18 +1000 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: [patch v2 for-4.0] mm, thp: really limit transparent hugepage allocation to local node In-Reply-To: <55488994.8010303@suse.cz> References: <54EDA96C.4000609@suse.cz> <54EE60FC.7000909@suse.cz> <87k2x6q6n0.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <55488994.8010303@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 18:52:58 +0530 Message-ID: <87oalzcg5p.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Vlastimil Babka , David Rientjes Cc: Andrew Morton , Greg Thelen , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Vlastimil Babka writes: > On 04/21/2015 09:31 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >> Vlastimil Babka writes: >> >>> On 25.2.2015 22:24, David Rientjes wrote: >>>> >>>>> alloc_pages_preferred_node() variant, change the exact_node() variant to pass >>>>> __GFP_THISNODE, and audit and adjust all callers accordingly. >>>>> .... ... >>> Right, we might be changing behavior not just for slab allocators, but >>> also others using such >>> combination of flags. >> >> Any update on this ? Did we reach a conclusion on how to go forward here >> ? > > I believe David's later version was merged already. Or what exactly are > you asking about? When I checked last time I didn't find it. Hence I asked here. Now I see that it got committed as 5265047ac30191ea24b16503165000c225f54feb Thanks -aneesh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org