From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@au1.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: enable CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE on powerpc
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 12:39:51 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oa3hwwxs.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160921054500.lrqktzjqjhuzewqg@arbab-laptop>
Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:59:35AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>Movable node also does.
>> memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
>>What is the impact of that. Do we need changes equivalent to that ? Also
>>where are we marking the nodes which can be hotplugged, ie where do we
>>do memblock_mark_hotplug() ?
>
> These are related to the mechanism x86 uses to create movable nodes at
> boot. The SRAT is parsed to mark any hotplug memory. That marking is
> used later when initializing ZONE_MOVABLE for each node. [1]
>
> The bottom-up allocation is due to a timing issue [2]. There is a window
> where kernel memory may be allocated before the SRAT is parsed. Any
> bottom-up allocations done during that time will likely be in the same
> (nonmovable) node as the kernel image.
>
> On power, I don't think we have a heuristic equivalent to that SRAT
> memory hotplug info. So, we'll be limited to dynamically adding movable
> nodes after boot.
>
> 1. http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/lcjp13_chen.pdf
> 2. commit 79442ed189ac ("mm/memblock.c: introduce bottom-up allocation
> mode")
>
What I was checking was how will one mark a node movable in ppc64 ? I
don't see ppc64 code doing the equivalent of memblock_mark_hotplug().
So when you say "Onlining memory into ZONE_MOVABLE requires
CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE" where is that restriction ?. IIUC,
should_add_memory_movable() will only return ZONE_MOVABLE only if it is
non empty and MOVABLE_NODE will create a ZONE_MOVABLE zone by default
only if it finds a memblock marked hotpluggable. So wondering if we
are not calling memblock_mark_hotplug() how is it working. Or am I
missing something ?
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-21 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-14 20:06 [PATCH v2 0/3] powerpc/mm: movable hotplug memory nodes Reza Arbab
2016-09-14 20:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers/of: recognize status property of dt " Reza Arbab
2016-09-15 13:43 ` Rob Herring
2016-09-15 14:31 ` Reza Arbab
2016-09-19 10:11 ` Balbir Singh
2016-09-14 20:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] powerpc/mm: allow memory hotplug into a memoryless node Reza Arbab
2016-09-19 11:53 ` Balbir Singh
2016-09-21 5:50 ` Reza Arbab
2016-09-14 20:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: enable CONFIG_MOVABLE_NODE on powerpc Reza Arbab
2016-09-19 6:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-09-21 5:45 ` Reza Arbab
2016-09-21 7:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2016-09-21 14:08 ` Reza Arbab
2016-09-21 14:43 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2016-09-21 22:29 ` Reza Arbab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87oa3hwwxs.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox