From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
sthanneeru@micron.com, gregory.price@memverge.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] mm: mempolicy: Multi-tier weighted interleaving
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:57:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7gzm22n.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009204259.875232-1-gregory.price@memverge.com> (Gregory Price's message of "Mon, 9 Oct 2023 16:42:56 -0400")
Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com> writes:
> v2: change memtier mutex to semaphore
> add source-node relative weighting
> add remaining mempolicy integration code
>
> = v2 Notes
>
> Developed in colaboration with original authors to deconflict
> similar efforts to extend mempolicy to take weights directly.
>
> == Mutex to Semaphore change:
>
> The memory tiering subsystem is extended in this patch set to have
> externally available information (weights), and therefore additional
> controls need to be added to ensure values are not changed (or tiers
> changed/added/removed) during various calculations.
>
> Since it is expected that many threads will be accessing this data
> during allocations, a mutex is not appropriate.
IIUC, this is a change for performance. If so, please show some
performance data.
> Since write-updates (weight changes, hotplug events) are rare events,
> a simple rw semaphore is sufficient.
>
> == Source-node relative weighting:
>
> Tiers can now be weighted differently based on the node requesting
> the weight. For example CPU-Nodes 0 and 1 may have different weights
> for the same CXL memory tier, because topologically the number of
> NUMA hops is greater (or any other physical topological difference
> resulting in different effective latency or bandwidth values)
>
> 1. Set weights for DDR (tier4) and CXL(teir22) tiers.
> echo source_node:weight > /path/to/interleave_weight
If source_node is considered, why not consider target_node too? On a
system with only 1 tier (DRAM), do you want weighted interleaving among
NUMA nodes? If so, why tie weighted interleaving with memory tiers?
Why not just introduce weighted interleaving for NUMA nodes?
> # Set tier4 weight from node 0 to 85
> echo 0:85 > /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tier4/interleave_weight
> # Set tier4 weight from node 1 to 65
> echo 1:65 > /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tier4/interleave_weight
> # Set tier22 weight from node 0 to 15
> echo 0:15 > /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tier22/interleave_weight
> # Set tier22 weight from node 1 to 10
> echo 1:10 > /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tier22/interleave_weight
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-16 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-09 20:42 Gregory Price
2023-10-09 20:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm/memory-tiers: change mutex to rw semaphore Gregory Price
2023-10-09 20:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] mm/memory-tiers: Introduce sysfs for tier interleave weights Gregory Price
2023-10-09 20:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] mm/mempolicy: modify interleave mempolicy to use memtier weights Gregory Price
2023-10-11 21:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] mm: mempolicy: Multi-tier weighted interleaving Matthew Wilcox
2023-10-10 1:07 ` Gregory Price
2023-10-16 7:57 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2023-10-17 1:28 ` Gregory Price
2023-10-18 8:29 ` Huang, Ying
2023-10-17 2:52 ` Gregory Price
2023-10-19 6:28 ` Huang, Ying
2023-10-18 2:47 ` Gregory Price
2023-10-20 6:11 ` Huang, Ying
2023-10-19 13:26 ` Gregory Price
2023-10-23 2:09 ` Huang, Ying
2023-10-24 15:32 ` Gregory Price
2023-10-25 1:13 ` Huang, Ying
2023-10-25 19:51 ` Gregory Price
2023-10-30 2:20 ` Huang, Ying
2023-10-30 4:19 ` Gregory Price
2023-10-30 5:23 ` Huang, Ying
2023-10-18 8:31 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o7gzm22n.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gourry.memverge@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.price@memverge.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=sthanneeru@micron.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox