linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,  <mhocko@suse.com>,
	 <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	 <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,  <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	 <hughd@google.com>,  <shakeelb@google.com>,  <hdanton@sina.com>,
	 <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,  <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND v5 PATCH 2/2] mm: vmscan: correct some vmscan counters for THP swapout
Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 10:11:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87muj88x3p.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1558922275-31782-2-git-send-email-yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> (Yang Shi's message of "Mon, 27 May 2019 09:57:55 +0800")

Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com> writes:

> Since commit bd4c82c22c36 ("mm, THP, swap: delay splitting THP after
> swapped out"), THP can be swapped out in a whole.  But, nr_reclaimed
> and some other vm counters still get inc'ed by one even though a whole
> THP (512 pages) gets swapped out.
>
> This doesn't make too much sense to memory reclaim.  For example, direct
> reclaim may just need reclaim SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages, reclaiming one THP
> could fulfill it.  But, if nr_reclaimed is not increased correctly,
> direct reclaim may just waste time to reclaim more pages,
> SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX * 512 pages in worst case.
>
> And, it may cause pgsteal_{kswapd|direct} is greater than
> pgscan_{kswapd|direct}, like the below:
>
> pgsteal_kswapd 122933
> pgsteal_direct 26600225
> pgscan_kswapd 174153
> pgscan_direct 14678312
>
> nr_reclaimed and nr_scanned must be fixed in parallel otherwise it would
> break some page reclaim logic, e.g.
>
> vmpressure: this looks at the scanned/reclaimed ratio so it won't
> change semantics as long as scanned & reclaimed are fixed in parallel.
>
> compaction/reclaim: compaction wants a certain number of physical pages
> freed up before going back to compacting.
>
> kswapd priority raising: kswapd raises priority if we scan fewer pages
> than the reclaim target (which itself is obviously expressed in order-0
> pages). As a result, kswapd can falsely raise its aggressiveness even
> when it's making great progress.
>
> Other than nr_scanned and nr_reclaimed, some other counters, e.g.
> pgactivate, nr_skipped, nr_ref_keep and nr_unmap_fail need to be fixed
> too since they are user visible via cgroup, /proc/vmstat or trace
> points, otherwise they would be underreported.
>
> When isolating pages from LRUs, nr_taken has been accounted in base
> page, but nr_scanned and nr_skipped are still accounted in THP.  It
> doesn't make too much sense too since this may cause trace point
> underreport the numbers as well.
>
> So accounting those counters in base page instead of accounting THP as
> one page.
>
> nr_dirty, nr_unqueued_dirty, nr_congested and nr_writeback are used by
> file cache, so they are not impacted by THP swap.
>
> This change may result in lower steal/scan ratio in some cases since
> THP may get split during page reclaim, then a part of tail pages get
> reclaimed instead of the whole 512 pages, but nr_scanned is accounted
> by 512, particularly for direct reclaim.  But, this should be not a
> significant issue.
>
> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> v5: Fixed sc->nr_scanned double accounting per Huang Ying
>     Added some comments to address the concern about premature OOM per Hillf Danton 
> v4: Fixed the comments from Johannes and Huang Ying
> v3: Removed Shakeel's Reviewed-by since the patch has been changed significantly
>     Switched back to use compound_order per Matthew
>     Fixed more counters per Johannes
> v2: Added Shakeel's Reviewed-by
>     Use hpage_nr_pages instead of compound_order per Huang Ying and William Kucharski
>
>  mm/vmscan.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index b65bc50..f4f4d57 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1118,6 +1118,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
>  		int may_enter_fs;
>  		enum page_references references = PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN;
>  		bool dirty, writeback;
> +		unsigned int nr_pages;
>  
>  		cond_resched();
>  
> @@ -1129,6 +1130,13 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
>  
>  		VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageActive(page), page);
>  
> +		nr_pages = 1 << compound_order(page);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Accounted one page for THP for now.  If THP gets swapped
> +		 * out in a whole, will account all tail pages later to
> +		 * avoid accounting tail pages twice.
> +		 */
>  		sc->nr_scanned++;
>  
>  		if (unlikely(!page_evictable(page)))
> @@ -1250,7 +1258,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
>  		case PAGEREF_ACTIVATE:
>  			goto activate_locked;
>  		case PAGEREF_KEEP:
> -			stat->nr_ref_keep++;
> +			stat->nr_ref_keep += nr_pages;
>  			goto keep_locked;
>  		case PAGEREF_RECLAIM:
>  		case PAGEREF_RECLAIM_CLEAN:

If the "Accessed bit" of a THP is set in the page table that maps it, it
will go PAGEREF_ACTIVATE path here.  And the sc->nr_scanned should
increase 512 instead of 1.  Otherwise sc->nr_activate may be larger than
sc->nr_scanned.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-27  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-27  1:57 [RESEND v5 PATCH 1/2] mm: vmscan: remove double slab pressure by inc'ing sc->nr_scanned Yang Shi
2019-05-27  1:57 ` [RESEND v5 PATCH 2/2] mm: vmscan: correct some vmscan counters for THP swapout Yang Shi
2019-05-27  2:11   ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2019-05-27  2:47     ` Yang Shi
2019-05-27  2:58       ` Huang, Ying
2019-05-27  3:15         ` Yang Shi
2019-05-27  2:59       ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87muj88x3p.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox