From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH hotfix] mm/migrate: fix kernel BUG at mm/compaction.c:2761!
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 14:19:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msnq7key.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46c948b4-4dd8-6e03-4c7b-ce4e81cfa536@google.com> (Hugh Dickins's message of "Tue, 11 Jun 2024 22:06:20 -0700 (PDT)")
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> writes:
> I hit the VM_BUG_ON(!list_empty(&cc->migratepages)) in compact_zone();
> and if DEBUG_VM were off, then pages would be lost on a local list.
>
> Our convention is that if migrate_pages() reports complete success (0),
> then the migratepages list will be empty; but if it reports an error or
> some pages remaining, then its caller must putback_movable_pages().
>
> There's a new case in which migrate_pages() has been reporting complete
> success, but returning with pages left on the migratepages list: when
> migrate_pages_batch() successfully split a folio on the deferred list,
> but then the "Failure isn't counted" call does not dispose of them all.
>
> Since that block is expecting the large folio to have been counted as 1
> failure already, and since the return code is later adjusted to success
> whenever the returned list is found empty, the simple way to fix this
> safely is to count splitting the deferred folio as "a failure".
>
> Fixes: 7262f208ca68 ("mm/migrate: split source folio if it is on deferred split list")
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> ---
> A hotfix to 6.10-rc, not needed for stable.
>
> mm/migrate.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1654,7 +1654,12 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from,
>
> /*
> * The rare folio on the deferred split list should
> - * be split now. It should not count as a failure.
> + * be split now. It should not count as a failure:
> + * but increment nr_failed because, without doing so,
> + * migrate_pages() may report success with (split but
> + * unmigrated) pages still on its fromlist; whereas it
> + * always reports success when its fromlist is empty.
> + *
> * Only check it without removing it from the list.
> * Since the folio can be on deferred_split_scan()
> * local list and removing it can cause the local list
> @@ -1669,6 +1674,7 @@ static int migrate_pages_batch(struct list_head *from,
> if (nr_pages > 2 &&
> !list_empty(&folio->_deferred_list)) {
> if (try_split_folio(folio, split_folios) == 0) {
> + nr_failed++;
It appears better to add
stats->nr_thp_failed++;
too. Otherwise, if migrate_pages_batch() is called via migrate_pages(,
MIGRATE_ASYNC, ), nr_thp_failed will not increase. But if
migrate_pages_batch() is called via migrate_pages(, MIGRATE_SYNC*, ),
nr_thp_failed will increase in migrate_pages_sync() via
stats->nr_thp_failed += astats.nr_thp_split;
That is, they are not consistent. The issue exists since commit
7262f208ca68 ("mm/migrate: split source folio if it is on deferred split
list").
Otherwise, this looks good to me. Thanks!
> stats->nr_thp_split += is_thp;
> stats->nr_split++;
> continue;
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-12 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-12 5:06 Hugh Dickins
2024-06-12 6:19 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2024-06-12 7:11 ` Hugh Dickins
2024-06-12 16:00 ` Andrew Morton
2024-07-08 15:52 ` Peter Xu
2024-07-08 16:39 ` Zi Yan
2024-07-08 21:50 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msnq7key.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox