From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: 2.5.65-mm1 References: <20030318031104.13fb34cc.akpm@digeo.com> <87adfs4sqk.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com> <87bs08vfkg.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com> <20030318160902.C21945@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <873clkw6ui.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com> <20030318162601.78f11739.akpm@digeo.com> From: Alexander Hoogerhuis Date: 19 Mar 2003 07:16:48 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20030318162601.78f11739.akpm@digeo.com> Message-ID: <87llzbc23z.fsf@lapper.ihatent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrew Morton Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Andrew Morton writes: > Alexander Hoogerhuis wrote: > > > > I'm not suspecting the PCI in particular for the PCIC-bits, only > > making X and the Radeon work again. But here you are: > > Something bad has happened to the Radeon driver in recent kernels. I've seen > various reports with various syptoms and some suspicion has been directed at > the AGP changes. > > But as far as I know nobody has actually got down and done the binary search > to find out exactly when it started happening. The AGP code enables my machine with 1xAGP, but under 2.4 with same X version it will support 4x. I had a poke around in the Intel AGP code and there doesn't seem to be a way to manually convinve the driver of the truth :) mvh, A -- Alexander Hoogerhuis | alexh@ihatent.com CCNP - CCDP - MCNE - CCSE | +47 908 21 485 "You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it." --Scott McNealy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org