linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>,
	Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>,
	Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:30:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lgfnzf82.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180215185606.26736-6-james.morse@arm.com>

One typo in the commit log otherwise looks good.

James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> writes:

> To split up APEIs in_nmi() path, we need the nmi-like callers to always
> be in_nmi(). Add a helper to do the work and claim the notification.
>
> When KVM or the arch code takes an exception that might be a RAS
> notification, it asks the APEI firmware-first code whether it wants
> to claim the exception. We can then go on to see if (a future)
> kernel-first mechanism wants to claim the notification, before
> falling through to the existing default behaviour.
>
> The NOTIFY_SEA code was merged before we had multiple, possibly
> interacting, NMI-like notifications and the need to consider kernel
> first in the future. Make the 'claiming' behaviour explicit.
>
> As we're restructuring the APEI code to allow multiple NMI-like
> notifications, any notification that might interrupt interrupts-masked
> code must always be wrapped in nmi_enter()/nmi_exit(). This allows APEI
> to use in_nmi() so choose between the raw/regular spinlock routines.
                  ^
                  to

Thanks,
Punit

>
> We mask SError over this window to prevent an asynchronous RAS error
> arriving and tripping 'nmi_enter()'s BUG_ON(in_nmi()).
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> CC: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> Why does apei_claim_sea() take a pt_regs? This gets used later to take
> APEI by the hand through NMI->IRQ context, depending on what we
> interrupted.
>
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h      |  3 +++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_ras.h   | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c           | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/mm/fault.c              | 31 +++++++------------------------
>  5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>

[...]

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-20 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-15 18:55 [PATCH 00/11] APEI in_nmi() rework and arm64 SDEI wire-up James Morse
2018-02-15 18:55 ` [PATCH 01/11] ACPI / APEI: Move the estatus queue code up, and under its own ifdef James Morse
2018-02-20 18:26   ` Punit Agrawal
2018-02-20 19:28   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-23 18:02     ` James Morse
2018-02-23 18:07       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-15 18:55 ` [PATCH 02/11] ACPI / APEI: Generalise the estatus queue's add/remove and notify code James Morse
2018-02-20 18:26   ` Punit Agrawal
2018-02-23 18:21     ` James Morse
2018-03-01 15:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-01 18:06     ` Punit Agrawal
2018-03-01 22:35       ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-07 18:15         ` James Morse
2018-03-08 10:44           ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-19 14:29             ` James Morse
2018-03-27 17:25               ` Borislav Petkov
2018-03-28 16:30                 ` James Morse
2018-04-17 15:10                   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-15 18:55 ` [PATCH 03/11] ACPI / APEI: Switch NOTIFY_SEA to use the estatus queue James Morse
2018-02-15 18:55 ` [PATCH 04/11] KVM: arm/arm64: Add kvm_ras.h to collect kvm specific RAS plumbing James Morse
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 05/11] arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface James Morse
2018-02-20 18:30   ` Punit Agrawal [this message]
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 06/11] ACPI / APEI: Make the fixmap_idx per-ghes to allow multiple in_nmi() users James Morse
2018-02-20 21:18   ` Tyler Baicar
2018-02-22 17:47     ` James Morse
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 07/11] ACPI / APEI: Split fixmap pages for arm64 NMI-like notifications James Morse
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 08/11] firmware: arm_sdei: Add ACPI GHES registration helper James Morse
2018-02-20 18:31   ` Punit Agrawal
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 09/11] ACPI / APEI: Add support for the SDEI GHES Notification type James Morse
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 10/11] mm/memory-failure: increase queued recovery work's priority James Morse
2018-02-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 11/11] arm64: acpi: Make apei_claim_sea() synchronise with APEI's irq work James Morse
2018-02-19 21:05 ` [PATCH 00/11] APEI in_nmi() rework and arm64 SDEI wire-up Borislav Petkov
2018-02-20 18:42 ` Punit Agrawal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87lgfnzf82.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=gengdongjiu@huawei.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox