From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BC9C4338F for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 03:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067596120A for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 03:25:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 067596120A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=xmission.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 617338D0001; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:25:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5C7786B0071; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:25:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 48F1B8D0001; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:25:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0185.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.185]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA456B006C for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:25:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin18.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE57B8249980 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 03:25:24 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78508533768.18.891BA79 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D9910000B5 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 03:25:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]:37352) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mIN3u-007tiF-D4; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:25:18 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95]:47806 helo=email.xmission.com) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mIN3h-008tKu-MV; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:25:11 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: "Ma\, XinjianX" Cc: Alexey Gladkov , "linux-kselftest\@vger.kernel.org" , lkp , "akpm\@linux-foundation.org" , "axboe\@kernel.dk" , "christian.brauner\@ubuntu.com" , "containers\@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "jannh\@google.com" , "keescook\@chromium.org" , "kernel-hardening\@lists.openwall.com" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm\@kvack.org" , "oleg\@redhat.com" , "torvalds\@linux-foundation.org" In-Reply-To: <06bb27f1d79243febf9ddc4633c4e084@intel.com> (XinjianX Ma's message of "Tue, 24 Aug 2021 01:19:52 +0000") References: <87a6lgysxp.fsf@disp2133> <20210818131117.x7omzb2wkjq7le3s@example.org> <87o89ttqql.fsf@disp2133> <20210819172618.qwrrw4m7wt33wfmz@example.org> <87eeajswfc.fsf_-_@disp2133> <06bb27f1d79243febf9ddc4633c4e084@intel.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:24:17 -0500 Message-ID: <87lf4rplsu.fsf@disp2133> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1mIN3h-008tKu-MV;;;mid=<87lf4rplsu.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1++AiEZW5KIHsfe2U3AKqShPsf05OHNwZw= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] ucounts: Fix regression preventing increasing of rlimits in init_user_ns X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=xmission.com; spf=pass (imf07.hostedemail.com: domain of ebiederm@xmission.com designates 166.70.13.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ebiederm@xmission.com X-Stat-Signature: hferktuw3sej9wf1hpr6dqkbreic6qkk X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 40D9910000B5 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-HE-Tag: 1629775523-365404 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: "Ma, XinjianX" writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric W. Biederman >> ... >> Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com > Sorry, but <> around email address is needed > Reported-by: kernel test robot The change is already tested and pushed out so I really don't want to mess with it. Especially as I am aiming to send it to Linus on Wednesday after it has had a chance to pass through linux-next and whatever automated tests are there. What does copying and pasting the Reported-by: tag as included in your original report cause to break? At this point I suspect that the danger of fat fingering something far outweighs whatever benefits might be gained by surrounding the email address with <> marks. Eric