* [RFC PATCH] mm/swapfile: add cond_resched() in get_swap_pages()
@ 2023-01-28 7:20 Longlong Xia
2023-01-28 8:29 ` Huang, Ying
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Longlong Xia @ 2023-01-28 7:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, ying.huang, chenwandun, wangkefeng.wang,
sunnanyong, Longlong Xia
We found that the plist_for_each_entry_safe() loop in get_swap_pages()
could reach tens of thousands of times to find available space (extreme
case: cond_resched() is not called in the loop). The test scenario is like
commit de1ccfb64824 ("swapfile: fix soft lockup in scan_swap_map_slots")
does. On the other hand, scan_swap_map_slots() needs to reach LATENCY_LIMIT
before calling cond_resched(), so cond_resched() is needed when failed to
find available space to avoid softlockup.
Signed-off-by: Longlong Xia <xialonglong1@huawei.com>
---
mm/swapfile.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
index 908a529bca12..4fa440e87cd6 100644
--- a/mm/swapfile.c
+++ b/mm/swapfile.c
@@ -1100,6 +1100,7 @@ int get_swap_pages(int n_goal, swp_entry_t swp_entries[], int entry_size)
goto check_out;
pr_debug("scan_swap_map of si %d failed to find offset\n",
si->type);
+ cond_resched();
spin_lock(&swap_avail_lock);
nextsi:
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/swapfile: add cond_resched() in get_swap_pages()
2023-01-28 7:20 [RFC PATCH] mm/swapfile: add cond_resched() in get_swap_pages() Longlong Xia
@ 2023-01-28 8:29 ` Huang, Ying
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Huang, Ying @ 2023-01-28 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Longlong Xia
Cc: akpm, linux-mm, linux-kernel, chenwandun, wangkefeng.wang, sunnanyong
Hi, Longlong,
Longlong Xia <xialonglong1@huawei.com> writes:
> We found that the plist_for_each_entry_safe() loop in get_swap_pages()
> could reach tens of thousands of times to find available space (extreme
> case: cond_resched() is not called in the loop). The test scenario is like
> commit de1ccfb64824 ("swapfile: fix soft lockup in scan_swap_map_slots")
> does. On the other hand, scan_swap_map_slots() needs to reach LATENCY_LIMIT
> before calling cond_resched(), so cond_resched() is needed when failed to
> find available space to avoid softlockup.
Thanks for the patch. The patch itself looks good to me.
I think that it's better to describe the test case in the patch
description directly instead of referring the previous commit.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> Signed-off-by: Longlong Xia <xialonglong1@huawei.com>
> ---
> mm/swapfile.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 908a529bca12..4fa440e87cd6 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -1100,6 +1100,7 @@ int get_swap_pages(int n_goal, swp_entry_t swp_entries[], int entry_size)
> goto check_out;
> pr_debug("scan_swap_map of si %d failed to find offset\n",
> si->type);
> + cond_resched();
>
> spin_lock(&swap_avail_lock);
> nextsi:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-01-28 8:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-01-28 7:20 [RFC PATCH] mm/swapfile: add cond_resched() in get_swap_pages() Longlong Xia
2023-01-28 8:29 ` Huang, Ying
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox