linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,  <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<kernel_team@skhynix.com>,  <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	<namit@vmware.com>,  <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
	<mgorman@techsingularity.net>,  <hughd@google.com>,
	<willy@infradead.org>,  <david@redhat.com>,
	 <peterz@infradead.org>, <luto@kernel.org>,  <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	 <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	 <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [v4 0/3] Reduce TLB flushes under some specific conditions
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2023 13:20:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87il6bijtu.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231109045908.54996-1-byungchul@sk.com> (Byungchul Park's message of "Thu, 9 Nov 2023 13:59:05 +0900")

Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com> writes:

> Hi everyone,
>
> While I'm working with CXL memory, I have been facing migration overhead
> esp. TLB shootdown on promotion or demotion between different tiers.
> Yeah.. most TLB shootdowns on migration through hinting fault can be
> avoided thanks to Huang Ying's work, commit 4d4b6d66db ("mm,unmap: avoid
> flushing TLB in batch if PTE is inaccessible").
>
> However, it's only for ones using hinting fault. I thought it'd be much
> better if we have a general mechanism to reduce # of TLB flushes and
> TLB misses, that we can apply to any type of migration. I tried it only
> for tiering migration for now tho.
>
> I'm suggesting a mechanism to reduce TLB flushes by keeping source and
> destination of folios participated in the migrations until all TLB
> flushes required are done, only if those folios are not mapped with
> write permission PTE entries at all. I worked Based on v6.6-rc5.
>
> Can you believe it? I saw the number of TLB full flush reduced about
> 80% and iTLB miss reduced about 50%, and the time wise performance
> always shows at least 1% stable improvement with the workload I tested
> with, XSBench. However, I believe that it would help more with other
> ones or any real ones. It'd be appreciated to let me know if I'm missing
> something.

Can you help to test the effect of commit 7e12beb8ca2a ("migrate_pages:
batch flushing TLB") for your test case?  To test it, you can revert it
and compare the performance before and after the reverting.

And, how do you trigger migration when testing XSBench?  Use a tiered
memory system, and migrate pages between DRAM and CXL memory back and
forth?  If so, how many pages will you migrate for each migration?

--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

>
> 	Byungchul
>
> ---
>
> Changes from v3:
>
> 	1. Don't use the kconfig, CONFIG_MIGRC, and remove sysctl knob,
> 	   migrc_enable. (feedbacked by Nadav)
> 	2. Remove the optimization skipping CPUs that have already
> 	   performed TLB flushes needed by any reason when performing
> 	   TLB flushes by migrc because I can't tell the performance
> 	   difference between w/ the optimization and w/o that.
> 	   (feedbacked by Nadav)
> 	3. Minimize arch-specific code. While at it, move all the migrc
>            declarations and inline functions from include/linux/mm.h to
>            mm/internal.h (feedbacked by Dave Hansen, Nadav)
> 	4. Separate a part making migrc paused when the system is in
> 	   high memory pressure to another patch. (feedbacked by Nadav)
> 	5. Rename:
> 	      a. arch_tlbbatch_clean() to arch_tlbbatch_clear(),
> 	      b. tlb_ubc_nowr to tlb_ubc_ro,
> 	      c. migrc_try_flush_free_folios() to migrc_flush_free_folios(),
> 	      d. migrc_stop to migrc_pause.
> 	   (feedbacked by Nadav)
> 	6. Use ->lru list_head instead of introducing a new llist_head.
> 	   (feedbacked by Nadav)
> 	7. Use non-atomic operations of page-flag when it's safe.
> 	   (feedbacked by Nadav)
> 	8. Use stack instead of keeping a pointer of 'struct migrc_req'
> 	   in struct task, which is for manipulating it locally.
> 	   (feedbacked by Nadav)
> 	9. Replace a lot of simple functions to inline functions placed
> 	   in a header, mm/internal.h. (feedbacked by Nadav)
> 	10. Add additional sufficient comments. (feedbacked by Nadav)
> 	11. Remove a lot of wrapper functions. (feedbacked by Nadav)
>
> Changes from RFC v2:
>
> 	1. Remove additional occupation in struct page. To do that,
> 	   unioned with lru field for migrc's list and added a page
> 	   flag. I know page flag is a thing that we don't like to add
> 	   but no choice because migrc should distinguish folios under
> 	   migrc's control from others. Instead, I force migrc to be
> 	   used only on 64 bit system to mitigate you guys from getting
> 	   angry.
> 	2. Remove meaningless internal object allocator that I
> 	   introduced to minimize impact onto the system. However, a ton
> 	   of tests showed there was no difference.
> 	3. Stop migrc from working when the system is in high memory
> 	   pressure like about to perform direct reclaim. At the
> 	   condition where the swap mechanism is heavily used, I found
> 	   the system suffered from regression without this control.
> 	4. Exclude folios that pte_dirty() == true from migrc's interest
> 	   so that migrc can work simpler.
> 	5. Combine several patches that work tightly coupled to one.
> 	6. Add sufficient comments for better review.
> 	7. Manage migrc's request in per-node manner (from globally).
> 	8. Add TLB miss improvement in commit message.
> 	9. Test with more CPUs(4 -> 16) to see bigger improvement.
>
> Changes from RFC:
>
> 	1. Fix a bug triggered when a destination folio at the previous
> 	   migration becomes a source folio at the next migration,
> 	   before the folio gets handled properly so that the folio can
> 	   play with another migration. There was inconsistency in the
> 	   folio's state. Fixed it.
> 	2. Split the patch set into more pieces so that the folks can
> 	   review better. (Feedbacked by Nadav Amit)
> 	3. Fix a wrong usage of barrier e.g. smp_mb__after_atomic().
> 	   (Feedbacked by Nadav Amit)
> 	4. Tried to add sufficient comments to explain the patch set
> 	   better. (Feedbacked by Nadav Amit)
>
> Byungchul Park (3):
>   mm/rmap: Recognize read-only TLB entries during batched TLB flush
>   mm: Defer TLB flush by keeping both src and dst folios at migration
>   mm: Pause migrc mechanism at high memory pressure
>
>  arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h |   3 +
>  arch/x86/mm/tlb.c               |  11 ++
>  include/linux/mm_types.h        |  21 +++
>  include/linux/mmzone.h          |   9 ++
>  include/linux/page-flags.h      |   4 +
>  include/linux/sched.h           |   7 +
>  include/trace/events/mmflags.h  |   3 +-
>  mm/internal.h                   |  78 ++++++++++
>  mm/memory.c                     |  11 ++
>  mm/migrate.c                    | 266 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/page_alloc.c                 |  30 +++-
>  mm/rmap.c                       |  35 ++++-
>  12 files changed, 475 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-09  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-09  4:59 Byungchul Park
2023-11-09  4:59 ` [v4 1/3] mm/rmap: Recognize read-only TLB entries during batched TLB flush Byungchul Park
2023-11-09 20:26   ` kernel test robot
2023-11-09  4:59 ` [v4 2/3] mm: Defer TLB flush by keeping both src and dst folios at migration Byungchul Park
2023-11-09 14:36   ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-11-10  1:29     ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-15  7:55     ` Byungchul Park
2023-11-09 17:09   ` kernel test robot
2023-11-09 19:07   ` kernel test robot
2023-11-09  4:59 ` [v4 3/3] mm: Pause migrc mechanism at high memory pressure Byungchul Park
2023-11-09  5:20 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2023-11-10  1:32   ` [v4 0/3] Reduce TLB flushes under some specific conditions Byungchul Park
2023-11-15  2:57   ` Byungchul Park
2023-11-09 14:26 ` Dave Hansen
2023-11-10  1:08   ` Byungchul Park
2023-11-15  6:43   ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-15  7:58   ` Byungchul Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87il6bijtu.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=byungchul@sk.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox