Re: [RFC] Reserve huge pages for reliable MAP_PRIVATE hugetlbfs mappings

[Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>]

Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> writes:

> MAP_SHARED mappings on hugetlbfs reserve huge pages at mmap() time. This is
> so that all future faults will be guaranteed to succeed. Applications are not
> expected to use mlock() as this can result in poor NUMA placement.
>
> MAP_PRIVATE mappings do not reserve pages. This can result in an application
> being SIGKILLed later if a large page is not available at fault time. This
> makes huge pages usage very ill-advised in some cases as the unexpected
> application failure is intolerable. Forcing potential poor placement with
> mlock() is not a great solution either.
>
> This patch reserves huge pages at mmap() time for MAP_PRIVATE mappings similar
> to what happens for MAP_SHARED mappings. 

This will break all applications that mmap more hugetlbpages than they
actually use. How do you know these don't exist?

> Opinions?

Seems like a risky interface change to me.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>