linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH slab hotfixes v2 2/2] slub/kunit: skip test_kfree_rcu when the slub kunit test is built-in
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 06:52:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87f2fe09-ba6a-4405-b716-5325bb6a223b@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <80d0cd70-c00a-475c-a028-e842fb86403b@suse.cz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1929 bytes --]

On 10/2/24 03:26, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 10/1/24 18:20, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Guenter Roeck reports that the new slub kunit tests added by commit
>> 4e1c44b3db79 ("kunit, slub: add test_kfree_rcu() and
>> test_leak_destroy()") cause a lockup on boot on several architectures
>> when the kunit tests are configured to be built-in and not modules.
>>
>> The test_kfree_rcu test invokes kfree_rcu() and boot sequence inspection
>> showed the runner for built-in kunit tests kunit_run_all_tests() is
>> called before setting system_state to SYSTEM_RUNNING and calling
>> rcu_end_inkernel_boot(), so this seems like a likely cause. So while I
>> was unable to reproduce the problem myself, skipping the test when the
>> slub_kunit module is built-in should avoid the issue.
>>
>> An alternative fix that was moving the call to kunit_run_all_tests() a
>> bit later in the boot was tried, but has broken tests with functions
>> marked as __init due to free_initmem() already being done.
>>
>> Fixes: 4e1c44b3db79 ("kunit, slub: add test_kfree_rcu() and test_leak_destroy()")
>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6fcb1252-7990-4f0d-8027-5e83f0fb9409@roeck-us.net/
> 
> I hope you can confirm it helps, because the commit added two tests and I've
> only skipped one of them, as it's the one using kfree_rcu(), which is
> suspected. But the other is responsible for the (now suppressed)
> kmem_cache_destroy() warning, and maybe I'm missing something and it was
> actually that one causing the lockups.
> 

Everything works with your patches applied, so we are good.

> Since you mentioned the boot lockups happened on some x86_64 too, do you
> have a .config of the lockup case? I've tried tweaking some rcu options but
> still nothing.
> 

I have a bunch of debug options enabled. Configuration (generated using
"make savedefconfig") for x86_64 is attached.

Thanks,
Guenter

[-- Attachment #2: defconfig.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 2834 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-02 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-01 16:20 [PATCH slab hotfixes v2 0/2] slub kunit tests fixes for 6.12 Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-01 16:20 ` [PATCH slab hotfixes v2 1/2] mm, slab: suppress warnings in test_leak_destroy kunit test Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-02 13:44   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-10-01 16:20 ` [PATCH slab hotfixes v2 2/2] slub/kunit: skip test_kfree_rcu when the slub kunit test is built-in Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-02 10:26   ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-02 13:52     ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2024-10-02 14:44       ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-10-02 13:46   ` Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87f2fe09-ba6a-4405-b716-5325bb6a223b@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox