From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 4.12-rc ppc64 4k-page needs costly allocations
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 15:44:29 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efuvdoea.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1706012045240.4854@eggly.anvils>
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2017, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> writes:
>> > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Ok so debugging was off but the slab cache has a ctor callback which
>> >> mandates that the free pointer cannot use the free object space when
>> >> the object is not in use. Thus the size of the object must be increased to
>> >> accomodate the freepointer.
>> >
>> > Thanks a lot for working that out. Makes sense, fully understood now,
>> > nothing to worry about (though makes one wonder whether it's efficient
>> > to use ctors on high-alignment caches; or whether an internal "zero-me"
>> > ctor would be useful).
>>
>> Or should we just be using kmem_cache_zalloc() when we allocate from
>> those slabs?
>>
>> Given all the ctor's do is memset to 0.
>
> I'm not sure. From a memory-utilization point of view, with SLUB,
> using kmem_cache_zalloc() there would certainly be better.
>
> But you may be forgetting that the constructor is applied only when a
> new slab of objects is allocated, not each time an object is allocated
> from that slab (and the user of those objects agrees to free objects
> back to the cache in a reusable state: zeroed in this case).
Ah yes, I was "forgetting" that :) - ie. didn't know it.
> So from a cpu-utilization point of view, it's better to use the ctor:
> it's saving you lots of redundant memsets.
OK. Presumably we guarantee (somewhere) that the page tables are zeroed
before we free them, which is a natural result of tearing down all
mappings?
But then I see other arches (x86, arm64 at least), which don't use a
constructor, and use __GPF_ZERO (via PGALLOC_GFP) at allocation time.
eg. arm64:
pgd_cache = kmem_cache_create("pgd_cache", PGD_SIZE, PGD_SIZE,
SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
...
return kmem_cache_alloc(pgd_cache, PGALLOC_GFP);
So that's a bit puzzling.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-08 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-30 19:43 Hugh Dickins
2017-05-31 6:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-05-31 14:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-05-31 18:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2017-05-31 19:02 ` Mathieu Malaterre
2017-06-01 15:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-06-01 17:22 ` Hugh Dickins
2017-06-01 18:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-06-01 18:37 ` Hugh Dickins
2017-06-02 3:09 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-02 4:00 ` Hugh Dickins
2017-06-02 14:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-06-08 5:44 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2017-06-02 14:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-06-08 5:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-05-31 14:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-06-01 4:19 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-06-01 16:57 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87efuvdoea.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox