linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	npiggin@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/5] mm/hugetlb: Add prot_modify_start/commit sequence for hugetlb update
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 21:54:47 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d0oequtk.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190116085035.29729-5-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>

"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> writes:

> Architectures like ppc64 require to do a conditional tlb flush based on the old
> and new value of pte. Follow the regular pte change protection sequence for
> hugetlb too. This allows the architectures to override the update sequence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/hugetlb.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/hugetlb.c            |  8 +++++---
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 087fd5f48c91..39e78b80375c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -543,6 +543,26 @@ static inline void set_huge_swap_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr
>  	set_huge_pte_at(mm, addr, ptep, pte);
>  }
>  #endif
> +
> +#ifndef huge_ptep_modify_prot_start
> +#define huge_ptep_modify_prot_start huge_ptep_modify_prot_start
> +static inline pte_t huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +						unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep)
> +{
> +	return huge_ptep_get_and_clear(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit
> +#define huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit
> +static inline void huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> +						unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep,
> +						pte_t old_pte, pte_t pte)
> +{
> +	set_huge_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, pte);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #else	/* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
>  struct hstate {};
>  #define alloc_huge_page(v, a, r) NULL
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index df2e7dd5ff17..f824d2200ca9 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -4387,10 +4387,12 @@ unsigned long hugetlb_change_protection(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  		if (!huge_pte_none(pte)) {
> -			pte = huge_ptep_get_and_clear(mm, address, ptep);
> -			pte = pte_mkhuge(huge_pte_modify(pte, newprot));
> +			pte_t old_pte;
> +
> +			old_pte = huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, address, ptep);
> +			pte = pte_mkhuge(huge_pte_modify(old_pte, newprot));
>  			pte = arch_make_huge_pte(pte, vma, NULL, 0);
> -			set_huge_pte_at(mm, address, ptep, pte);
> +			huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, address, ptep, old_pte, pte);
>  			pages++;
>  		}
>  		spin_unlock(ptl);

Looks like a faithful conversion.

Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

cheers


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-30 10:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-16  8:50 [PATCH V5 0/5] NestMMU pte upgrade workaround for mprotect Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-16  8:50 ` [PATCH V5 1/5] mm: Update ptep_modify_prot_start/commit to take vm_area_struct as arg Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-30 10:33   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-16  8:50 ` [PATCH V5 2/5] mm: update ptep_modify_prot_commit to take old pte value " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-30 10:46   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-31  5:03     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-16  8:50 ` [PATCH V5 3/5] arch/powerpc/mm: Nest MMU workaround for mprotect RW upgrade Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-30 10:52   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-31  5:07     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-16  8:50 ` [PATCH V5 4/5] mm/hugetlb: Add prot_modify_start/commit sequence for hugetlb update Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-30 10:54   ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2019-01-16  8:50 ` [PATCH V5 5/5] arch/powerpc/mm/hugetlb: NestMMU workaround for hugetlb mprotect RW upgrade Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-30 11:01   ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-29 10:43 ` [PATCH V5 0/5] NestMMU pte upgrade workaround for mprotect Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-01-29 18:29 ` Andrew Morton
2019-02-26 23:37 ` Andrew Morton
2019-02-27  8:58   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-02-28 19:39     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d0oequtk.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox