From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7BFC3A5A6 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 19:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09B123430 for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 19:46:30 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A09B123430 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=xmission.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 28FF76B000A; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:46:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 240076B000C; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:46:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 155C06B000D; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:46:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0070.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CF46B000A for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 15:46:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin01.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A1E4D40CA for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 19:46:29 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75880126098.01.jelly45_38966a7b33001 X-HE-Tag: jelly45_38966a7b33001 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5911 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) by imf39.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 19:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1i3mqo-0002rY-QA; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:46:26 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=x220.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1i3mqC-0002tz-B5; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:46:26 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Jing Xiangfeng , kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, gustavo@embeddedor.com, bhelgaas@google.com, tglx@linutronix.de, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <1567171877-101949-1-git-send-email-jingxiangfeng@huawei.com> <20190830133522.GZ13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:45:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20190830133522.GZ13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (Russell King's message of "Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:35:22 +0100") Message-ID: <87d0gmwi73.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1i3mqC-0002tz-B5;;;mid=<87d0gmwi73.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX18NMO9dKN/ZIv2eAbj5eODKvFQtgC+w5Xg= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: fix page faults in do_alignment X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 09:31:17PM +0800, Jing Xiangfeng wrote: >> The function do_alignment can handle misaligned address for user and >> kernel space. If it is a userspace access, do_alignment may fail on >> a low-memory situation, because page faults are disabled in >> probe_kernel_address. >> >> Fix this by using __copy_from_user stead of probe_kernel_address. >> >> Fixes: b255188 ("ARM: fix scheduling while atomic warning in alignment handling code") >> Signed-off-by: Jing Xiangfeng > > NAK. > > The "scheduling while atomic warning in alignment handling code" is > caused by fixing up the page fault while trying to handle the > mis-alignment fault generated from an instruction in atomic context. > > Your patch re-introduces that bug. And the patch that fixed scheduling while atomic apparently introduced a regression. Admittedly a regression that took 6 years to track down but still. So it looks like the code needs to do something like: diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c index 04b36436cbc0..5e2b8623851e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c @@ -784,6 +784,9 @@ do_alignment(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs) instrptr = instruction_pointer(regs); + if (user_mode(regs)) + goto user; + if (thumb_mode(regs)) { u16 *ptr = (u16 *)(instrptr & ~1); fault = probe_kernel_address(ptr, tinstr); @@ -933,6 +936,34 @@ do_alignment(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs) return 1; user: + if (thumb_mode(regs)) { + u16 *ptr = (u16 *)(instrptr & ~1); + fault = get_user(tinstr, ptr); + tinstr = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(tinstr); + if (!fault) { + if (cpu_architecture() >= CPU_ARCH_ARMv7 && + IS_T32(tinstr)) { + /* Thumb-2 32-bit */ + u16 tinst2 = 0; + fault = get_user(ptr + 1, tinst2); + tinst2 = __mem_to_opcode_thumb16(tinst2); + instr = __opcode_thumb32_compose(tinstr, tinst2); + thumb2_32b = 1; + } else { + isize = 2; + instr = thumb2arm(tinstr); + } + } + } else { + fault = get_user(instr, (u32*)instrptr); + instr = __mem_to_opcode_arm(instr); + } + + if (fault) { + type = TYPE_FAULT; + goto bad_or_fault; + } + ai_user += 1; if (ai_usermode & UM_WARN) Eric