From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
To: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
tnowicki@caviumnetworks.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, wanghuiqiang@huawei.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
zhongjiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: avoid alloc memory on offline node
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:39:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bmce60y3.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lgbk59gs.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (Punit Agrawal's message of "Tue, 12 Jun 2018 16:08:03 +0100")
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> writes:
[...]
>
> CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS node is not enabled on arm64 which means we end
> up returning the original node in the fallback path.
>
> Xie, does the below patch help? I can submit a proper patch if this
> fixes the issue for you.
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64/numa: Enable memoryless numa nodes
>
> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 4 ++++
> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index eb2cf4938f6d..5317e9aa93ab 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -756,6 +756,10 @@ config USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
> def_bool y
> depends on NUMA
>
> +config HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
> + def_bool y
> + depends on NUMA
> +
> config HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
> def_bool y
> depends on NUMA
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> index dad128ba98bf..c699dcfe93de 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_of_node);
> static void map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid)
> {
> set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, nid);
> + set_numa_mem(local_memory_node(nid));
Argh, this should be
set_cpu_numa_mem(cpu, local_memory_node(nid));
There is not guarantee that map_cpu_to_node() will be called on the
local cpu.
Hanjun, Xie - can you try with the update please?
Thanks,
Punit
> +
> if (nid >= 0)
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, node_to_cpumask_map[nid]);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-06-13 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1527768879-88161-1-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <1527768879-88161-2-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <20180606154516.GL6631@arm.com>
2018-06-06 20:39 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-06-07 10:55 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-07 11:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-06-07 12:21 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-11 3:23 ` Xie XiuQi
2018-06-11 8:52 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-11 12:32 ` Xie XiuQi
2018-06-11 13:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-06-11 14:53 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-12 15:08 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-12 15:20 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-13 17:39 ` Punit Agrawal [this message]
2018-06-14 6:23 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-06-19 12:03 ` Xie XiuQi
2018-06-19 12:07 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-19 12:40 ` Xie XiuQi
2018-06-19 12:52 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-19 14:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-06-19 14:54 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-19 15:14 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-19 15:35 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-19 16:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-06-20 3:31 ` Xie XiuQi
2018-06-20 11:51 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-22 8:58 ` Hanjun Guo
2018-06-22 9:11 ` Michal Hocko
2018-06-22 10:24 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-22 17:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2018-06-26 17:27 ` Punit Agrawal
2018-06-26 17:27 ` Punit Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bmce60y3.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tnowicki@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=zhongjiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox