linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
	"Jason@zx2c4.com" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	"pedro.falcato@gmail.com" <pedro.falcato@gmail.com>,
	Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] minmax: reduce compilation time
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 17:56:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87b65cac-a7f6-490b-9cdb-617584d3edac@lucifer.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5124037f-03eb-4966-8b49-a6fac0fd3662@kernel.dk>

On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 10:52:32AM GMT, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 7/27/24 10:41 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> >>> Patch attached including Jens's change + mine.
> >>
> >> bvec side matches what I have here, fwiw, except I also did
> >> mp_bvec_iter_len(). Didn't see big expansion there, but might as well
> >> keep them consistent.
> >
> > Makes sense, am happy to give R-b tag for this patch if you want to put it
> > forward? Not sure if Linus is minded to just pull something for this now?
>
> Here's what I built (allmodconfig, gcc-14 and clang-20) and did a basic
> boot of. Was just going to shove it into the 6.12 queue once posted, but
> can go either way with this. Or Linus can just grab it and run with it,
> not super particular ;-)

Yeah looks good to me, either way have:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>

>
> > If we're whack-a-moleing may as well sort the drivers I found in my
> > allmodconfig too obviously as some hilariously low-hanging fruit there...
>
> Oh I'm not, I got plenty of other things to tend to. Just got sucked
> into the block side as that looked nuts, wanted to make that wasn't
> insane.
>

Fully understandable, and it is the weekend after all :)

As I am clearly a bit bored this w/e, I might take a look at the obvious
bits there myself if Linus hasn't already patched...

Have an allmodconfig build going now.

>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h
> index f41c7f0ef91e..1cb76a829b83 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bvec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
> @@ -101,9 +101,14 @@ struct bvec_iter_all {
>  #define mp_bvec_iter_page(bvec, iter)				\
>  	(__bvec_iter_bvec((bvec), (iter))->bv_page)
>
> -#define mp_bvec_iter_len(bvec, iter)				\
> -	min((iter).bi_size,					\
> -	    __bvec_iter_bvec((bvec), (iter))->bv_len - (iter).bi_bvec_done)
> +static inline unsigned mp_bvec_iter_len(const struct bio_vec *bvec,
> +					struct bvec_iter iter)
> +{
> +	unsigned remains = __bvec_iter_bvec(bvec, iter)->bv_len -
> +				iter.bi_bvec_done;
> +
> +	return remains < iter.bi_size ? remains : iter.bi_size;
> +}
>
>  #define mp_bvec_iter_offset(bvec, iter)				\
>  	(__bvec_iter_bvec((bvec), (iter))->bv_offset + (iter).bi_bvec_done)
> @@ -111,12 +116,15 @@ struct bvec_iter_all {
>  #define mp_bvec_iter_page_idx(bvec, iter)			\
>  	(mp_bvec_iter_offset((bvec), (iter)) / PAGE_SIZE)
>
> -#define mp_bvec_iter_bvec(bvec, iter)				\
> -((struct bio_vec) {						\
> -	.bv_page	= mp_bvec_iter_page((bvec), (iter)),	\
> -	.bv_len		= mp_bvec_iter_len((bvec), (iter)),	\
> -	.bv_offset	= mp_bvec_iter_offset((bvec), (iter)),	\
> -})
> +static inline struct bio_vec mp_bvec_iter_bvec(const struct bio_vec *bv,
> +					       struct bvec_iter iter)
> +{
> +	return (struct bio_vec) {
> +		.bv_page	= mp_bvec_iter_page(bv, iter),
> +		.bv_len		= mp_bvec_iter_len(bv, iter),
> +		.bv_offset	= mp_bvec_iter_offset(bv, iter)
> +	};
> +}
>
>  /* For building single-page bvec in flight */
>   #define bvec_iter_offset(bvec, iter)				\
> @@ -130,12 +138,15 @@ struct bvec_iter_all {
>  	(mp_bvec_iter_page((bvec), (iter)) +			\
>  	 mp_bvec_iter_page_idx((bvec), (iter)))
>
> -#define bvec_iter_bvec(bvec, iter)				\
> -((struct bio_vec) {						\
> -	.bv_page	= bvec_iter_page((bvec), (iter)),	\
> -	.bv_len		= bvec_iter_len((bvec), (iter)),	\
> -	.bv_offset	= bvec_iter_offset((bvec), (iter)),	\
> -})
> +static inline struct bio_vec bvec_iter_bvec(const struct bio_vec *bv,
> +					    struct bvec_iter iter)
> +{
> +	return (struct bio_vec) {
> +		.bv_page	= bvec_iter_page(bv, iter),
> +		.bv_len		= bvec_iter_len(bv, iter),
> +		.bv_offset	= bvec_iter_offset(bv, iter)
> +	};
> +}
>
>  static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
>  		struct bvec_iter *iter, unsigned bytes)
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-27 16:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-24 14:26 David Laight
2024-07-24 14:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] minmax: Put all the clamp() definitions together David Laight
2024-07-24 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] minmax: Use _Static_assert() instead of static_assert() David Laight
2024-07-24 14:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] compiler.h: Add __if_constexpr(expr, if_const, if_not_const) David Laight
2024-07-24 17:32   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-25  9:12     ` David Laight
2024-07-24 19:48   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-25  8:45     ` David Laight
2024-07-24 14:30 ` [PATCH 4/7] minmax: Simplify signedness check David Laight
2024-07-24 16:48   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-24 20:02     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-25  9:00       ` David Laight
2024-07-25 17:02         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26  9:43           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 12:57             ` David Laight
2024-07-26 13:27               ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-25 13:24   ` kernel test robot
2024-07-25 16:39     ` David Laight
2024-07-24 14:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] minmax: Factor out the zero-extension logic from umin/umax David Laight
2024-07-24 14:32 ` [PATCH 6/7] minmax: Optimise _Static_assert() check in clamp() David Laight
2024-07-24 14:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] minmax: minmax: Add __types_ok3() and optimise defines with 3 arguments David Laight
2024-07-24 17:03   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-25  9:07     ` David Laight
2024-07-24 19:34 ` [PATCH 0/7] minmax: reduce compilation time Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-24 19:52   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26 18:12     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 18:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26 18:56         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 19:21           ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 21:36             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-26 21:46               ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-26 22:48               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 15:30                 ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-27 15:38                   ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-27 16:31                     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 16:36                       ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-27 16:41                         ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 16:52                           ` Jens Axboe
2024-07-27 16:56                             ` Lorenzo Stoakes [this message]
2024-07-28 11:32                       ` David Laight
2024-07-27  4:13               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27  4:14                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27  8:08                 ` David Laight
2024-07-27 18:58                   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 19:21                     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-28 11:17                     ` David Laight
2024-07-28 13:07                       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 17:33                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-07-27 18:16                   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27  8:07             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-27 16:26               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-27 18:44                 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-30  4:10                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-30 10:36                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-28 17:57           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-07-28 18:43             ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-07-26 21:32         ` David Laight
2024-07-26 21:38           ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87b65cac-a7f6-490b-9cdb-617584d3edac@lucifer.local \
    --to=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
    --cc=pedro.falcato@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox