From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 8/8] x86_64: Support for new UV apic
Date: 25 Mar 2008 11:25:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87abknhzhd.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080324182122.GA28327@sgi.com>
Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> writes:
> unsigned int get_apic_id(void)
> {
> - return (apic_read(APIC_ID) >> 24) & 0xFFu;
> + unsigned int id;
> +
> + preempt_disable();
> + id = apic_read(APIC_ID);
> + if (uv_system_type >= UV_X2APIC)
> + id |= __get_cpu_var(x2apic_extra_bits);
> + else
> + id = (id >> 24) & 0xFFu;;
> + preempt_enable();
> + return id;
Really caller should have done preempt_disable(), otherwise
the value can be wrong as soon as you return.
Better probably to just WARN_ON if preemption is on
(just be careful it does not trigger in oopses and machine checks)
> +
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct uv_hub_info_s, __uv_hub_info);
> +EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__uv_hub_info);
GPL export too?
> +
> +struct uv_blade_info *uv_blade_info;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_blade_info);
> +
> +short *uv_node_to_blade;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_node_to_blade);
> +
> +short *uv_cpu_to_blade;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_cpu_to_blade);
> +
> +short uv_possible_blades;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_possible_blades);
> +
> +/* Start with all IRQs pointing to boot CPU. IRQ balancing will shift them. */
> +/* Probably incorrect for UV ZZZ */
Actually it should be correct. Except for UV you likely really need a
NUMA aware irqbalanced. I used to have some old very hackish patches
to implement that in irqbalanced, but never pushed it because the
systems I was working on didn't really need it.
> +
> +static void uv_send_IPI_one(int cpu, int vector)
> +{
> + unsigned long val, apicid;
> + int nasid;
> +
> + apicid = per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_apicid, cpu); /* ZZZ - cache node-local ? */
Instead of doing that it might be better to implement __read_mostly per CPU variables
(should not be very hard)
> +static void uv_send_IPI_mask(cpumask_t mask, int vector)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + unsigned int cpu;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; ++cpu)
> + if (cpu_isset(cpu, mask))
> + uv_send_IPI_one(cpu, vector);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
This could disable interrupts for a long time could't it? Really needed?
> + bytes = sizeof(struct uv_blade_info) * uv_num_possible_blades();
> + uv_blade_info = alloc_bootmem_pages(bytes);
> + memset(uv_blade_info, 255, bytes);
255? Strange poison value.
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile 2008-03-21 15:36:35.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile 2008-03-21 15:49:38.000000000 -0500
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ scx200-y += scx200_32.o
> ###
> # 64 bit specific files
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_X86_64),y)
> - obj-y += genapic_64.o genapic_flat_64.o
> + obj-y += genapic_64.o genapic_flat_64.o genx2apic_uv_x.o
Definitely should be a CONFIG
> @@ -418,6 +419,9 @@ static int __cpuinit wakeup_secondary_vi
> unsigned long send_status, accept_status = 0;
> int maxlvt, num_starts, j;
>
> + if (get_uv_system_type() == UV_NON_UNIQUE_APIC)
> + return uv_wakeup_secondary(phys_apicid, start_rip);
> +
This should be probably factored properly (didn't Jeremy have smp_ops
for this some time ago) so that even the default case is a call.
> Dprintk("Asserting INIT.\n");
>
> /*
> @@ -679,7 +683,8 @@ do_rest:
> /* trampoline code not run */
> printk("Not responding.\n");
> #ifdef APIC_DEBUG
> - inquire_remote_apic(apicid);
> + if (get_uv_system_type() != UV_NON_UNIQUE_APIC)
> + inquire_remote_apic(apicid);
Dito.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-25 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-24 18:21 Jack Steiner
2008-03-25 10:25 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-03-25 17:56 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-25 18:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-26 2:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-26 3:22 ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-26 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 7:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-30 20:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 21:03 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 21:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-30 23:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 2:18 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-31 2:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 12:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-31 12:52 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-31 18:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-31 6:48 ` Andi Kleen
2008-03-25 14:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-25 16:31 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-26 3:24 ` Glauber Costa
2008-03-30 20:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-30 21:08 ` Jack Steiner
2008-03-30 23:24 ` Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87abknhzhd.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox