From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Weiner Subject: Re: [patch] mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings II References: <87r669fq2v.fsf@saeurebad.de> <87ljwhfo4e.fsf@saeurebad.de> <20081022152911.1CD9.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:15:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20081022152911.1CD9.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (KOSAKI Motohiro's message of "Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:39:41 +0900 (JST)") Message-ID: <87abcxksn1.fsf@saeurebad.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Andrew Morton , npiggin@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: KOSAKI Motohiro writes: >> >> Is http://hannes.saeurebad.de/madvseq/ still true with this version? >> > >> > No, sorry, still running benchmarks on this version. Coming up >> > soon... >> >> Ok, reran the tests I used for the data on this website and updated it. >> Take a look. I am quite overwhelmed by the results, hehe. >> >> Kosaki-san, could you perhaps run the tests you did for the previous >> patch on this one, too? I am not getting any stable results for >> throughput measuring... > > Usually, any reclaim throughput mesurement isn't stable. > Then I used an average of five times mesurement. Ah, okay. I will give it another spin, too. > Unfortunately, I can't understand I should mesure which patch combination > because you and Nick post many patches of this issue related yesterday. > Please let me know it? mmotm - the old mm-more-likely-reclaim-madv_sequential-mappings + Nick's mm: dont mark_page_accessed in fault path (from yesterday) + Apply this patch Andrew's tree (not yet released) already has the first two changes, so if he releases a new mmotm in the meantime, you only need this patch on top of it. Hannes -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org