From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
npiggin@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings II
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:15:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87abcxksn1.fsf@saeurebad.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081022152911.1CD9.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> (KOSAKI Motohiro's message of "Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:39:41 +0900 (JST)")
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> writes:
>> >> Is http://hannes.saeurebad.de/madvseq/ still true with this version?
>> >
>> > No, sorry, still running benchmarks on this version. Coming up
>> > soon...
>>
>> Ok, reran the tests I used for the data on this website and updated it.
>> Take a look. I am quite overwhelmed by the results, hehe.
>>
>> Kosaki-san, could you perhaps run the tests you did for the previous
>> patch on this one, too? I am not getting any stable results for
>> throughput measuring...
>
> Usually, any reclaim throughput mesurement isn't stable.
> Then I used an average of five times mesurement.
Ah, okay. I will give it another spin, too.
> Unfortunately, I can't understand I should mesure which patch combination
> because you and Nick post many patches of this issue related yesterday.
> Please let me know it?
mmotm
- the old mm-more-likely-reclaim-madv_sequential-mappings
+ Nick's mm: dont mark_page_accessed in fault path (from yesterday)
+ Apply this patch
Andrew's tree (not yet released) already has the first two changes, so
if he releases a new mmotm in the meantime, you only need this patch on
top of it.
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-22 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-21 10:32 [rfc] mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings Johannes Weiner
2008-10-21 10:43 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-21 11:33 ` [patch] mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings II Johannes Weiner
2008-10-21 22:13 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-22 0:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-22 0:51 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-22 6:39 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-22 7:15 ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2008-10-22 7:41 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-24 0:21 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-24 12:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-24 14:02 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-24 14:31 ` Rik van Riel
2008-10-24 16:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-24 23:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2008-10-24 18:59 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-21 14:40 ` [rfc] mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings Rik van Riel
2008-10-21 15:20 ` Johannes Weiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87abcxksn1.fsf@saeurebad.de \
--to=hannes@saeurebad.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox