From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
dvhart@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net, andrealmeid@igalia.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
urezki@gmail.com, hch@infradead.org, lstoakes@gmail.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, malteskarupke@web.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/14] futex: Extend the FUTEX2 flags
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 23:14:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5vbn5r0.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230731192012.GA11704@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Mon, Jul 31 2023 at 21:20, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> -#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_64 | FUTEX2_PRIVATE)
> +#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_SIZE_MASK | FUTEX2_PRIVATE)
Along with some comment which documents that the size "flags" constitute
a number field and not flags in the sense of binary flags.
And please name these size constants so it really becomes obvious:
#define FUTEX2_SIZE_U32 2
> /**
> * futex_parse_waitv - Parse a waitv array from userspace
> @@ -208,11 +208,11 @@ static int futex_parse_waitv(struct fute
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) || in_compat_syscall()) {
> - if ((aux.flags & FUTEX2_64) == FUTEX2_64)
> + if ((aux.flags & FUTEX2_SIZE_MASK) == FUTEX2_64)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
That should be part of the actual 64bit futex enablement, no?
> - if ((aux.flags & FUTEX2_64) != FUTEX2_32)
> + if ((aux.flags & FUTEX2_SIZE_MASK) != FUTEX2_32)
> return -EINVAL;
In hindsight I think it was as mistake just to have this __u32 flags
field in the new interface. Soemthing like the incomplete below might be
retrofittable, no?
--- a/include/uapi/linux/futex.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/futex.h
@@ -74,7 +74,12 @@
struct futex_waitv {
__u64 val;
__u64 uaddr;
- __u32 flags;
+ union {
+ __u32 flags;
+ __u32 size : 2,
+ : 5,
+ private : 1;
+ };
__u32 __reserved;
};
--- a/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
+++ b/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
@@ -204,10 +204,10 @@ static int futex_parse_waitv(struct fute
if (copy_from_user(&aux, &uwaitv[i], sizeof(aux)))
return -EFAULT;
- if ((aux.flags & ~FUTEX2_MASK) || aux.__reserved)
+ if ((aux.flags & ~FUTEX2_VALID_FLAGBITS) || aux.__reserved)
return -EINVAL;
- if (!(aux.flags & FUTEX2_32))
+ if (aux.size != FUTEX2_SIZE_U32)
return -EINVAL;
futexv[i].w.flags = aux.flags;
If this muck already confused me right now, then I don't want to
experience the confusion factor 6 month down the road :)
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-31 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-21 10:22 [PATCH v1 00/14] futex: More futex2 bits Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 01/14] futex: Clarify FUTEX2 flags Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 16:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 02/14] futex: Extend the " Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 15:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-07-21 18:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 16:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-31 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 17:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-31 17:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 20:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-31 17:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-31 19:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 21:14 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-07-31 21:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 22:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-31 22:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-08-01 8:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-08-01 6:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 03/14] futex: Flag conversion Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 16:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-31 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 04/14] futex: Validate futex value against futex size Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 17:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 05/14] futex: Add sys_futex_wake() Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 15:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-07-21 18:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 21:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-07-25 7:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 06/14] futex: Add sys_futex_wait() Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-25 7:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-07-31 16:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 07/14] futex: Propagate flags into get_futex_key() Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 16:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 08/14] futex: Add flags2 argument to futex_requeue() Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 16:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 09/14] futex: Add sys_futex_requeue() Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-25 7:23 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-07-31 17:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-31 17:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 10/14] mm: Add vmalloc_huge_node() Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-24 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 11/14] futex: Implement FUTEX2_NUMA Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 17:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-07-31 18:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-31 21:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-06-12 17:07 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-06-12 17:23 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-06-12 17:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-25 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-25 19:36 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2024-10-26 7:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-10-28 22:32 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 12/14] futex: Propagate flags into futex_get_value_locked() Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 13/14] futex: Enable FUTEX2_{8,16} Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v1 14/14] futex,selftests: Extend the futex selftests Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-21 14:42 ` [PATCH v1 00/14] futex: More futex2 bits Jens Axboe
2023-07-21 15:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a5vbn5r0.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=malteskarupke@web.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox