From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: "Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenchuang@bytedance.com>
Cc: "Gregory Price" <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>,
aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, mhocko@suse.com, tj@kernel.org,
john@jagalactic.com, "Eishan Mirakhur" <emirakhur@micron.com>,
"Vinicius Tavares Petrucci" <vtavarespetr@micron.com>,
"Ravis OpenSrc" <Ravis.OpenSrc@micron.com>,
"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Srinivasulu Thanneeru" <sthanneeru@micron.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenc@vt.edu>,
"Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenchuang@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] memory tier: create CPUless memory tiers after obtaining HMAT info
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 08:57:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5mhlus5.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240329004815.195476-3-horenchuang@bytedance.com> (Ho-Ren Chuang's message of "Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:48:14 +0000")
"Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang" <horenchuang@bytedance.com> writes:
> The current implementation treats emulated memory devices, such as
> CXL1.1 type3 memory, as normal DRAM when they are emulated as normal memory
> (E820_TYPE_RAM). However, these emulated devices have different
> characteristics than traditional DRAM, making it important to
> distinguish them. Thus, we modify the tiered memory initialization process
> to introduce a delay specifically for CPUless NUMA nodes. This delay
> ensures that the memory tier initialization for these nodes is deferred
> until HMAT information is obtained during the boot process. Finally,
> demotion tables are recalculated at the end.
>
> * late_initcall(memory_tier_late_init);
> Some device drivers may have initialized memory tiers between
> `memory_tier_init()` and `memory_tier_late_init()`, potentially bringing
> online memory nodes and configuring memory tiers. They should be excluded
> in the late init.
>
> * Handle cases where there is no HMAT when creating memory tiers
> There is a scenario where a CPUless node does not provide HMAT information.
> If no HMAT is specified, it falls back to using the default DRAM tier.
>
> * Introduce another new lock `default_dram_perf_lock` for adist calculation
> In the current implementation, iterating through CPUlist nodes requires
> holding the `memory_tier_lock`. However, `mt_calc_adistance()` will end up
> trying to acquire the same lock, leading to a potential deadlock.
> Therefore, we propose introducing a standalone `default_dram_perf_lock` to
> protect `default_dram_perf_*`. This approach not only avoids deadlock
> but also prevents holding a large lock simultaneously.
>
> * Upgrade `set_node_memory_tier` to support additional cases, including
> default DRAM, late CPUless, and hot-plugged initializations.
> To cover hot-plugged memory nodes, `mt_calc_adistance()` and
> `mt_find_alloc_memory_type()` are moved into `set_node_memory_tier()` to
> handle cases where memtype is not initialized and where HMAT information is
> available.
>
> * Introduce `default_memory_types` for those memory types that are not
> initialized by device drivers.
> Because late initialized memory and default DRAM memory need to be managed,
> a default memory type is created for storing all memory types that are
> not initialized by device drivers and as a fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horenchuang@bytedance.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
> ---
> mm/memory-tiers.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-tiers.c b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> index 974af10cfdd8..e24fc3bebae4 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-tiers.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-tiers.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,11 @@ struct node_memory_type_map {
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(memory_tier_lock);
> static LIST_HEAD(memory_tiers);
> +/*
> + * The list is used to store all memory types that are not created
> + * by a device driver.
> + */
> +static LIST_HEAD(default_memory_types);
> static struct node_memory_type_map node_memory_types[MAX_NUMNODES];
> struct memory_dev_type *default_dram_type;
>
> @@ -108,6 +113,8 @@ static struct demotion_nodes *node_demotion __read_mostly;
>
> static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(mt_adistance_algorithms);
>
> +/* The lock is used to protect `default_dram_perf*` info and nid. */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(default_dram_perf_lock);
> static bool default_dram_perf_error;
> static struct access_coordinate default_dram_perf;
> static int default_dram_perf_ref_nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
> @@ -505,7 +512,8 @@ static inline void __init_node_memory_type(int node, struct memory_dev_type *mem
> static struct memory_tier *set_node_memory_tier(int node)
> {
> struct memory_tier *memtier;
> - struct memory_dev_type *memtype;
> + struct memory_dev_type *mtype = default_dram_type;
> + int adist = MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM;
> pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(node);
>
>
> @@ -514,11 +522,20 @@ static struct memory_tier *set_node_memory_tier(int node)
> if (!node_state(node, N_MEMORY))
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> - __init_node_memory_type(node, default_dram_type);
> + mt_calc_adistance(node, &adist);
> + if (node_memory_types[node].memtype == NULL) {
> + mtype = mt_find_alloc_memory_type(adist, &default_memory_types);
> + if (IS_ERR(mtype)) {
> + mtype = default_dram_type;
> + pr_info("Failed to allocate a memory type. Fall back.\n");
> + }
> + }
> +
> + __init_node_memory_type(node, mtype);
>
> - memtype = node_memory_types[node].memtype;
> - node_set(node, memtype->nodes);
> - memtier = find_create_memory_tier(memtype);
> + mtype = node_memory_types[node].memtype;
> + node_set(node, mtype->nodes);
> + memtier = find_create_memory_tier(mtype);
> if (!IS_ERR(memtier))
> rcu_assign_pointer(pgdat->memtier, memtier);
> return memtier;
> @@ -655,6 +672,34 @@ void mt_put_memory_types(struct list_head *memory_types)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt_put_memory_types);
>
> +/*
> + * This is invoked via `late_initcall()` to initialize memory tiers for
> + * CPU-less memory nodes after driver initialization, which is
> + * expected to provide `adistance` algorithms.
> + */
> +static int __init memory_tier_late_init(void)
> +{
> + int nid;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> + for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY)
> + if (!node_state(nid, N_CPU) &&
It appears that you didn't notice my comments about this...
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/87v857kujp.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com/
> + node_memory_types[nid].memtype == NULL)
> + /*
> + * Some device drivers may have initialized memory tiers
> + * between `memory_tier_init()` and `memory_tier_late_init()`,
> + * potentially bringing online memory nodes and
> + * configuring memory tiers. Exclude them here.
> + */
> + set_node_memory_tier(nid);
> +
> + establish_demotion_targets();
> + mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +late_initcall(memory_tier_late_init);
> +
> static void dump_hmem_attrs(struct access_coordinate *coord, const char *prefix)
> {
> pr_info(
> @@ -668,7 +713,7 @@ int mt_set_default_dram_perf(int nid, struct access_coordinate *perf,
> {
> int rc = 0;
>
> - mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> + mutex_lock(&default_dram_perf_lock);
> if (default_dram_perf_error) {
> rc = -EIO;
> goto out;
> @@ -716,23 +761,30 @@ int mt_set_default_dram_perf(int nid, struct access_coordinate *perf,
> }
>
> out:
> - mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
> + mutex_unlock(&default_dram_perf_lock);
> return rc;
> }
>
> int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adist)
> {
> - if (default_dram_perf_error)
> - return -EIO;
> + int rc = 0;
>
> - if (default_dram_perf_ref_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> - return -ENOENT;
> + mutex_lock(&default_dram_perf_lock);
> + if (default_dram_perf_error) {
> + rc = -EIO;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> if (perf->read_latency + perf->write_latency == 0 ||
> - perf->read_bandwidth + perf->write_bandwidth == 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + perf->read_bandwidth + perf->write_bandwidth == 0) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
>
> - mutex_lock(&memory_tier_lock);
> + if (default_dram_perf_ref_nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) {
> + rc = -ENOENT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> /*
> * The abstract distance of a memory node is in direct proportion to
> * its memory latency (read + write) and inversely proportional to its
> @@ -745,8 +797,9 @@ int mt_perf_to_adistance(struct access_coordinate *perf, int *adist)
> (default_dram_perf.read_latency + default_dram_perf.write_latency) *
> (default_dram_perf.read_bandwidth + default_dram_perf.write_bandwidth) /
> (perf->read_bandwidth + perf->write_bandwidth);
> - mutex_unlock(&memory_tier_lock);
>
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&default_dram_perf_lock);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt_perf_to_adistance);
> @@ -858,7 +911,8 @@ static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
> * For now we can have 4 faster memory tiers with smaller adistance
> * than default DRAM tier.
> */
> - default_dram_type = alloc_memory_type(MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM);
> + default_dram_type = mt_find_alloc_memory_type(MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM,
> + &default_memory_types);
> if (IS_ERR(default_dram_type))
> panic("%s() failed to allocate default DRAM tier\n", __func__);
>
> @@ -868,6 +922,14 @@ static int __init memory_tier_init(void)
> * types assigned.
> */
> for_each_node_state(node, N_MEMORY) {
> + if (!node_state(node, N_CPU))
> + /*
> + * Defer memory tier initialization on CPUless numa nodes.
> + * These will be initialized after firmware and devices are
> + * initialized.
> + */
> + continue;
> +
> memtier = set_node_memory_tier(node);
> if (IS_ERR(memtier))
> /*
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-29 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-29 0:48 [PATCH v8 0/2] Improved Memory Tier Creation for CPUless NUMA Nodes Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang
2024-03-29 0:48 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] memory tier: dax/kmem: introduce an abstract layer for finding, allocating, and putting memory types Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang
2024-03-29 0:48 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] memory tier: create CPUless memory tiers after obtaining HMAT info Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang
2024-03-29 0:57 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2024-03-29 2:18 ` [External] " Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a5mhlus5.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=Ravis.OpenSrc@micron.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=emirakhur@micron.com \
--cc=gourry.memverge@gmail.com \
--cc=hao.xiang@bytedance.com \
--cc=horenc@vt.edu \
--cc=horenchuang@bytedance.com \
--cc=horenchuang@gmail.com \
--cc=john@jagalactic.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sthanneeru@micron.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=vtavarespetr@micron.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox