From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A00FEB64DD for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 13:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 6B9FE6B0071; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 09:36:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 642686B0072; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 09:36:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 495016B0075; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 09:36:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.11]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380586B0071 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 09:36:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DDDC0F03 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 13:36:42 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 81104666244.12.0B2B86C Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp (mail.parknet.co.jp [210.171.160.6]) by imf23.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDFC14000B for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 13:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of hirofumi@parknet.co.jp designates 210.171.160.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hirofumi@parknet.co.jp; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1691588199; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KXdgc6EQIVEa9D+5j3JIR4aqG3RqDbmd/d6hxGdzYFY=; b=N0Xa6KzCWozOi/WVesx++kr10P1DUlxGTYuU6Nqb57aCICa5RohVQwaSEDM6IX5YTLVrS0 qqMgMbFDi3qpGWSFxg6rk8TdLugrbfTTS5Ef6huI+kzwj5tRLsQhUiU2wFFAQGCT6VRjCo 5cqZfQsk50B3CP/hJMM0BDQmfWWwMc4= ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1691588199; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=eAI7YVWQ4EqtCikZHakAGhVGef8AQHeex2pKdxDbMmzqgKu4fR9J07oGT1SBg9Tq5zyaD6 rI3B0/Vu5sCMBEkC/tqnmUjXPjxthkCTmwbsEW3rv5qKkzDx8TC4v7QjBsa+Cg4KPpLVJd W4aBCuSFRwWNJmTRZsXKerCR1ttaPAE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf23.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (imf23.hostedemail.com: domain of hirofumi@parknet.co.jp designates 210.171.160.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hirofumi@parknet.co.jp; dmarc=none Received: from ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (server.parknet.ne.jp [210.171.168.39]) by mail.parknet.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E7A32055FA2; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 22:36:36 +0900 (JST) Received: from devron.myhome.or.jp (foobar@devron.myhome.or.jp [192.168.0.3]) by ibmpc.myhome.or.jp (8.17.2/8.17.2/Debian-1) with ESMTPS id 379DaZlY216308 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 9 Aug 2023 22:36:36 +0900 Received: from devron.myhome.or.jp (foobar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by devron.myhome.or.jp (8.17.2/8.17.2/Debian-1) with ESMTPS id 379DaZkg190033 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 9 Aug 2023 22:36:35 +0900 Received: (from hirofumi@localhost) by devron.myhome.or.jp (8.17.2/8.17.2/Submit) id 379DaTmi190025; Wed, 9 Aug 2023 22:36:29 +0900 From: OGAWA Hirofumi To: Jeff Layton Cc: Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , Dominique Martinet , Christian Schoenebeck , David Howells , Marc Dionne , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik , David Sterba , Xiubo Li , Ilya Dryomov , Jan Harkes , coda@cs.cmu.edu, Tyler Hicks , Gao Xiang , Chao Yu , Yue Hu , Jeffle Xu , Namjae Jeon , Sungjong Seo , Jan Kara , "Theodore Ts'o" , Andreas Dilger , Jaegeuk Kim , Miklos Szeredi , Bob Peterson , Andreas Gruenbacher , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tejun Heo , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Konstantin Komarov , Mark Fasheh , Joel Becker , Joseph Qi , Mike Marshall , Martin Brandenburg , Luis Chamberlain , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , Steve French , Paulo Alcantara , Ronnie Sahlberg , Shyam Prasad N , Tom Talpey , Sergey Senozhatsky , Richard Weinberger , Hans de Goede , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , Amir Goldstein , "Darrick J. Wong" , Benjamin Coddington , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs@lists.linux.dev, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, codalist@telemann.coda.cs.cmu.edu, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev, devel@lists.orangefs.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/13] fat: make fat_update_time get its own timestamp In-Reply-To: <52bead1d6a33fec89944b96e2ec20d1ea8747a9a.camel@kernel.org> (Jeff Layton's message of "Wed, 09 Aug 2023 06:10:53 -0400") References: <20230807-mgctime-v7-0-d1dec143a704@kernel.org> <20230807-mgctime-v7-5-d1dec143a704@kernel.org> <87msz08vc7.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> <52bead1d6a33fec89944b96e2ec20d1ea8747a9a.camel@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2023 22:36:29 +0900 Message-ID: <878rak8hia.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DBDFC14000B X-Rspam-User: X-Rspamd-Server: rspam11 X-Stat-Signature: ezc9dtg33w57qs5ja96tkd7to7kpia91 X-HE-Tag: 1691588198-183242 X-HE-Meta: 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 Mjmw7+vl vtQsE6srEK2MrQ9vi+t/NdPfeAWtCsoVqEqIrH/GyaenmOjqXwTXnxtgF2soLzvO7aiJrjpjR1Ndtet/ztRXg6i9/eAbr3NzVlG9IbkYopKCBpGOIH04Y5xuk5C32MezuVqi6tpx3pfj2kUOgArpvjNkEel60v76f6PHKux63AWNx0DisrrZ9i2NsoY0v9mXMzkwWwheGRYcVBUbn49RgeZcgCI2dhLorFo8c0HB1I4Acf9MC+bUzai/j+sBVg1ZQU9N2dEHQjwiTslAdH1Q9kjwbHqS9+e4gR8ray8Ro/f/tFOQ= X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Jeff Layton writes: > On Wed, 2023-08-09 at 17:37 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: >> Jeff Layton writes: >> >> > Also, it may be that things have changed by the time we get to calling >> > fat_update_time after checking inode_needs_update_time. Ensure that we >> > attempt the i_version bump if any of the S_* flags besides S_ATIME are >> > set. >> >> I'm not sure what it meaning though, this is from >> generic_update_time(). Are you going to change generic_update_time() >> too? If so, it doesn't break lazytime feature? >> > > Yes. generic_update_time is also being changed in a similar fashion. > This shouldn't break the lazytime feature: lazytime is all about how and > when timestamps get written to disk. This work is all about which > clocksource the timestamps originally come from. I can only find the following update in this series, another series updates generic_update_time()? The patch updates only if S_VERSION is set. Your fat patch sets I_DIRTY_SYNC always instead of I_DIRTY_TIME. When I last time checked lazytime, and it was depending on I_DIRTY_TIME. Are you sure it doesn't break lazytime? I'm totally confusing, and really similar with generic_update_time()? Thanks. +/** + * generic_update_time - update the timestamps on the inode + * @inode: inode to be updated + * @flags: S_* flags that needed to be updated + * + * The update_time function is called when an inode's timestamps need to be + * updated for a read or write operation. In the case where any of S_MTIME, S_CTIME, + * or S_VERSION need to be updated we attempt to update all three of them. S_ATIME + * updates can be handled done independently of the rest. + * + * Returns a S_* mask indicating which fields were updated. + */ +int generic_update_time(struct inode *inode, int flags) +{ + int updated = inode_update_timestamps(inode, flags); + int dirty_flags = 0; + if (updated & (S_ATIME|S_MTIME|S_CTIME)) + dirty_flags = inode->i_sb->s_flags & SB_LAZYTIME ? I_DIRTY_TIME : I_DIRTY_SYNC; + if (updated & S_VERSION) + dirty_flags |= I_DIRTY_SYNC; __mark_inode_dirty(inode, dirty_flags); - return 0; + return updated; } >> > - if ((flags & S_VERSION) && inode_maybe_inc_iversion(inode, false)) >> > + if ((flags & (S_VERSION|S_CTIME|S_MTIME)) && inode_maybe_inc_iversion(inode, false)) >> > dirty_flags |= I_DIRTY_SYNC; >> > >> > __mark_inode_dirty(inode, dirty_flags); >> -- OGAWA Hirofumi