From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<kernel_team@skhynix.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<namit@vmware.com>, <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
<mgorman@techsingularity.net>, <hughd@google.com>,
<willy@infradead.org>, <david@redhat.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <luto@kernel.org>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] mm: Defer TLB flush by keeping both src and dst folios at migration
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 10:51:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878ra5ds5o.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230821012804.GA43847@system.software.com> (Byungchul Park's message of "Mon, 21 Aug 2023 10:28:05 +0900")
Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:01:12AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 09:27:26AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> >> Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Implementation of CONFIG_MIGRC that stands for 'Migration Read Copy'.
>> >> >
>> >> > We always face the migration overhead at either promotion or demotion,
>> >> > while working with tiered memory e.g. CXL memory and found out TLB
>> >> > shootdown is a quite big one that is needed to get rid of if possible.
>> >> >
>> >> > Fortunately, TLB flush can be defered or even skipped if both source and
>> >> > destination of folios during migration are kept until all TLB flushes
>> >> > required will have been done, of course, only if the target PTE entries
>> >> > have read only permission, more precisely speaking, don't have write
>> >> > permission. Otherwise, no doubt the folio might get messed up.
>> >> >
>> >> > To achieve that:
>> >> >
>> >> > 1. For the folios that have only non-writable TLB entries, prevent
>> >> > TLB flush by keeping both source and destination of folios during
>> >> > migration, which will be handled later at a better time.
>> >> >
>> >> > 2. When any non-writable TLB entry changes to writable e.g. through
>> >> > fault handler, give up CONFIG_MIGRC mechanism so as to perform
>> >> > TLB flush required right away.
>> >> >
>> >> > 3. TLB flushes can be skipped if all TLB flushes required to free the
>> >> > duplicated folios have been done by any reason, which doesn't have
>> >> > to be done from migrations.
>> >> >
>> >> > 4. Adjust watermark check routine, __zone_watermark_ok(), with the
>> >> > number of duplicated folios because those folios can be freed
>> >> > and obtained right away through appropreate TLB flushes.
>> >> >
>> >> > 5. Perform TLB flushes and free the duplicated folios pending the
>> >> > flushes if page allocation routine is in trouble due to memory
>> >> > pressure, even more aggresively for high order allocation.
>> >>
>> >> Is the optimization restricted for page migration only? Can it be used
>> >> for other places? Like page reclaiming?
>> >
>> > Just to make sure, are you talking about the (5) description? For now,
>> > it's performed at the beginning of __alloc_pages_slowpath(), say, before
>> > page recaiming. Do you think it'd be meaningful to perform it during page
>> > reclaiming? Or do you mean something else?
>>
>> Not for (5). TLB needs to be flushed during page reclaiming too. Can
>> similar method be used to reduce TLB flushing there too?
>
> If you were talking about unmapping for swap while reclaiming, then I
> think yes. The case can also take benefit from CONFIG_MIGRC.
Yes. Thanks for explanation.
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-21 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-04 6:18 [RFC 0/2] Reduce TLB flushes under some specific conditions Byungchul Park
2023-08-04 6:18 ` [RFC 1/2] mm/rmap: Recognize non-writable TLB entries during TLB batch flush Byungchul Park
2023-08-17 2:18 ` Xin Hao
2023-08-04 6:18 ` [RFC 2/2] mm: Defer TLB flush by keeping both src and dst folios at migration Byungchul Park
2023-08-04 16:08 ` Zi Yan
2023-08-07 0:43 ` Byungchul Park
2023-08-04 17:32 ` Nadav Amit
2023-08-07 1:42 ` Byungchul Park
2023-08-07 5:05 ` Byungchul Park
2023-08-15 1:27 ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-16 0:13 ` Byungchul Park
2023-08-16 1:01 ` Huang, Ying
2023-08-16 2:40 ` Byungchul Park
2023-08-21 1:28 ` Byungchul Park
2023-08-21 2:51 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2023-08-17 8:16 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878ra5ds5o.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox