From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fadump: Register the memory reserved by fadump
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 16:57:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877fbpt8ju.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160810064056.GB24800@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>>
>> > Conceptually it would be cleaner, if expensive, to calculate the real
>> > memblock reserves if HASH_EARLY and ditch the dma_reserve, memory_reserve
>> > and nr_kernel_pages entirely.
>>
>> Why is it expensive? memblock tracks the totals for all memory and
>> reserved memory AFAIK, so it should just be a case of subtracting one
>> from the other?
>
> Are you suggesting that we use something like
> memblock_phys_mem_size() but one which returns
> memblock.reserved.total_size ? Maybe a new function like
> memblock_reserved_mem_size()?
Yeah, something like that. I'm not sure if it actually needs a function,
AFAIK you can just look at the structure directly.
>> > Unfortuantely, aside from the calculation,
>> > there is a potential cost due to a smaller hash table that affects everyone,
>> > not just ppc64.
>>
>> Yeah OK. We could make it an arch hook, or controlled by a CONFIG.
>
> If its based on memblock.reserved.total_size, then should it be arch
> specific?
Yes I think so. Otherwise you have to test it on every architecture :)
>> > However, if the hash table is meant to be sized on the
>> > number of available pages then it really should be based on that and not
>> > just a made-up number.
>>
>> Yeah that seems to make sense.
>>
>> The one complication I think is that we may have memory that's marked
>> reserved in memblock, but is later freed to the page allocator (eg.
>> initrd).
>
> Yes, this is a possibility, for example lets say we want fadump to
> continue to run instead of rebooting to a new kernel as it does today.
But that's a bad idea and no one should ever do it.
For starters all your caches will be undersized, and anything that is
allocated per-node early in boot will not be allocated on the nodes
which were reserved, so the system's performance will potentially differ
from a normal boot in weird and unpredictable ways.
cheers
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-10 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 13:42 Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-04 14:09 ` Mel Gorman
2016-08-04 15:27 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-05 7:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-08-05 7:28 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-05 9:25 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-08-05 10:06 ` Mel Gorman
2016-08-10 6:02 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-08-10 6:40 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-10 6:57 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2016-08-10 9:21 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-10 7:51 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877fbpt8ju.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox