From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: fix CPUHP state to update node demotion order
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:41:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dfactwm.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lf3r7mqr.ffs@tglx> (Thomas Gleixner's message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2021 09:02:52 +0200")
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 18 2021 at 10:58, Huang Ying wrote:
>> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
>> CPUHP_SLUB_DEAD,
>> CPUHP_DEBUG_OBJ_DEAD,
>> CPUHP_MM_WRITEBACK_DEAD,
>> + CPUHP_MM_DEMOTION_OFFLINE,
>
> Please keep the _DEAD convention in that section. The plugged CPU is
> already gone.
Sure. Will do that.
>> CPUHP_MM_VMSTAT_DEAD,
>> CPUHP_SOFTIRQ_DEAD,
>> CPUHP_NET_MVNETA_DEAD,
>> @@ -240,6 +241,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
>> CPUHP_AP_BASE_CACHEINFO_ONLINE,
>> CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
>> CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN_END = CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN + 30,
>> + CPUHP_AP_MM_DEMOTION_ONLINE,
>
> Are there any ordering requirements of these states vs. other CPU
> hotplug states?
>
> If not, then please use the dynamically allocated states.
>
> If so, then please add a comment:
>
> + /* Must be before CPUHP_XXX and after CPUHP_YYY */
> + CPUHP_MM_DEMOTION_OFFLINE,
The callbacks need to be called after node_states[N_CPU] has been
updated during CPU online/offline. While node_states[N_CPU] is updated
in CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN and CPUHP_MM_VMSTAT_DEAD. So the new state must
be before CPUHP_MM_VMSTAT_DEAD for offline and after CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN
for online. I will update the patch and add the comments.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-21 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-18 2:58 Huang Ying
2021-09-18 4:04 ` Mika Penttilä
2021-09-18 6:56 ` Huang, Ying
2021-09-20 7:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-09-21 6:41 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877dfactwm.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox