From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
zhongjiang-ali <zhongjiang-ali@linux.alibaba.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V13 2/3] NUMA balancing: optimize page placement for memory tiering system
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 14:47:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874k4i2mp5.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4652446e-2089-a3c4-fbdb-321322887392@huawei.com> (Miaohe Lin's message of "Tue, 1 Mar 2022 14:28:13 +0800")
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> writes:
> On 2022/2/21 16:45, Huang Ying wrote:
>> With the advent of various new memory types, some machines will have
>> multiple types of memory, e.g. DRAM and PMEM (persistent memory). The
>> memory subsystem of these machines can be called memory tiering
>> system, because the performance of the different types of memory are
>> usually different.
>>
>> In such system, because of the memory accessing pattern changing etc,
>> some pages in the slow memory may become hot globally. So in this
>> patch, the NUMA balancing mechanism is enhanced to optimize the page
>> placement among the different memory types according to hot/cold
>> dynamically.
>>
>> In a typical memory tiering system, there are CPUs, fast memory and
>> slow memory in each physical NUMA node. The CPUs and the fast memory
>> will be put in one logical node (called fast memory node), while the
>> slow memory will be put in another (faked) logical node (called slow
>> memory node). That is, the fast memory is regarded as local while the
>> slow memory is regarded as remote. So it's possible for the recently
>> accessed pages in the slow memory node to be promoted to the fast
>> memory node via the existing NUMA balancing mechanism.
>>
>> The original NUMA balancing mechanism will stop to migrate pages if
>> the free memory of the target node becomes below the high watermark.
>> This is a reasonable policy if there's only one memory type. But this
>> makes the original NUMA balancing mechanism almost do not work to
>> optimize page placement among different memory types. Details are as
>> follows.
>>
>> It's the common cases that the working-set size of the workload is
>> larger than the size of the fast memory nodes. Otherwise, it's
>> unnecessary to use the slow memory at all. So, there are almost
>> always no enough free pages in the fast memory nodes, so that the
>> globally hot pages in the slow memory node cannot be promoted to the
>> fast memory node. To solve the issue, we have 2 choices as follows,
>>
>> a. Ignore the free pages watermark checking when promoting hot pages
>> from the slow memory node to the fast memory node. This will
>> create some memory pressure in the fast memory node, thus trigger
>> the memory reclaiming. So that, the cold pages in the fast memory
>> node will be demoted to the slow memory node.
>>
>> b. Make kswapd of the fast memory node to reclaim pages until the free
>> pages are a little more than the high watermark (named as promo
>> watermark). Then, if the free pages of the fast memory node reaches
>> high watermark, and some hot pages need to be promoted, kswapd of the
>> fast memory node will be waken up to demote more cold pages in the
>> fast memory node to the slow memory node. This will free some extra
>> space in the fast memory node, so the hot pages in the slow memory
>> node can be promoted to the fast memory node.
>>
>> The choice "a" may create high memory pressure in the fast memory
>> node. If the memory pressure of the workload is high, the memory
>> pressure may become so high that the memory allocation latency of the
>> workload is influenced, e.g. the direct reclaiming may be triggered.
>>
>> The choice "b" works much better at this aspect. If the memory
>> pressure of the workload is high, the hot pages promotion will stop
>> earlier because its allocation watermark is higher than that of the
>
> Many thanks for your path. The patch looks good to me but I have a question.
> WMARK_PROMO is only used inside pgdat_balanced when NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING
> is set. So its allocation watermark seems to be as same as the normal memory
> allocation. How should I understand the above sentence? Am I miss something?
Before allocating pages for promotion, the watermark of the fast node
will be checked (please refer to migrate_balanced_pgdat()). If the
watermark is going to be lower than the high watermark, promotion will
abort.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-01 6:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-21 8:45 [PATCH -V13 0/3] NUMA balancing: optimize memory " Huang Ying
2022-02-21 8:45 ` [PATCH -V13 1/3] NUMA Balancing: add page promotion counter Huang Ying
2022-02-21 8:45 ` [PATCH -V13 2/3] NUMA balancing: optimize page placement for memory tiering system Huang Ying
2022-02-22 16:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2022-02-28 15:54 ` Oscar Salvador
2022-03-01 1:16 ` Huang, Ying
2022-03-01 6:18 ` Oscar Salvador
2022-03-01 6:40 ` Huang, Ying
2022-03-01 6:28 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-03-01 6:47 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2022-03-01 7:51 ` Miaohe Lin
2022-02-21 8:45 ` [PATCH -V13 3/3] memory tiering: skip to scan fast memory Huang Ying
2022-03-01 6:33 ` Oscar Salvador
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874k4i2mp5.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=zhongjiang-ali@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox