From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<mgorman@suse.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <luto@kernel.org>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <yue.li@memverge.com>,
<Ravikumar.Bangoria@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Memory access profiler(IBS) driven NUMA balancing
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 11:34:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jrqb5ms.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c811078-c869-452a-8e2d-ebe720d21691@amd.com> (Bharata B. Rao's message of "Mon, 13 Feb 2023 08:53:55 +0530")
Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com> writes:
> On 2/13/2023 8:26 AM, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 2/8/2023 11:33 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 01:05:28PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> - Hardware provided access information could be very useful for driving
>>>>> hot page promotion in tiered memory systems. Need to check if this
>>>>> requires different tuning/heuristics apart from what NUMA balancing
>>>>> already does.
>>>>
>>>> I think Huang Ying looked at that from the Intel POV and I think the
>>>> conclusion was that it doesn't really work out. What you need is
>>>> frequency information, but the PMU doesn't really give you that. You
>>>> need to process a *ton* of PMU data in-kernel.
>>>
>>> What I am doing here is to feed the access data into NUMA balancing which
>>> already has the logic to aggregate that at task and numa group level and
>>> decide if that access is actionable in terms of migrating the page. In this
>>> context, I am not sure about the frequency information that you and Dave
>>> are mentioning. AFAIU, existing NUMA balancing takes care of taking
>>> action, IBS becomes an alternative source of access information to NUMA
>>> hint faults.
>>
>> We do need frequency information to determine whether a page is hot
>> enough to be migrated to the fast memory (promotion). What PMU provided
>> is just "recently" accessed pages, not "frequently" accessed pages. For
>> current NUMA balancing implementation, please check
>> NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING in should_numa_migrate_memory(). In
>> general, it estimates the page access frequency via measuring the
>> latency between page table scanning and page fault, the shorter the
>> latency, the higher the frequency. This isn't perfect, but provides a
>> starting point. You need to consider how to get frequency information
>> via PMU. For example, you may count access number for each page, aging
>> them periodically, and get hot threshold via some statistics.
>
> For the tiered memory hot page promotion case of NUMA balancing, we will
> have to maintain frequency information in software when such information
> isn't available from the hardware.
Yes. It's challenging to calculate frequency information. Please
consider how to do that.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-13 3:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-08 7:35 Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] x86/ibs: In-kernel IBS driver for page access profiling Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] x86/ibs: Drive NUMA balancing via IBS access data Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] x86/ibs: Enable per-process IBS from sched switch path Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] x86/ibs: Adjust access faults sampling period Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] x86/ibs: Delay the collection of HW-provided access info Bharata B Rao
2023-02-08 18:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] Memory access profiler(IBS) driven NUMA balancing Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-08 18:12 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-09 6:04 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-09 14:28 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-10 4:28 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-10 4:40 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-10 15:10 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-09 5:57 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-13 2:56 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-13 3:23 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-13 3:34 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2023-02-13 3:26 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-13 5:52 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-13 6:30 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-14 4:55 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-15 6:07 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-24 3:28 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-16 8:41 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-17 6:03 ` Huang, Ying
2023-02-24 3:36 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-02-27 7:54 ` Huang, Ying
2023-03-01 11:21 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-03-02 8:10 ` Huang, Ying
2023-03-03 5:25 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-03-03 5:53 ` Huang, Ying
2023-03-06 15:30 ` Bharata B Rao
2023-03-07 2:33 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874jrqb5ms.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=Ravikumar.Bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yue.li@memverge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox