From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Peng Zhang <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <willy@infradead.org>,
<fengwei.yin@intel.com>, <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
<shy828301@gmail.com>, <hughd@google.com>, <david@redhat.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] filemap: avoid unnecessary major faults in filemap_fault()
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2024 10:54:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jen4o43.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240204093526.212636-1-zhangpeng362@huawei.com> (Peng Zhang's message of "Sun, 4 Feb 2024 17:35:26 +0800")
Peng Zhang <zhangpeng362@huawei.com> writes:
> From: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
>
> The major fault occurred when using mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE)
> in application, which leading to an unexpected performance issue[1].
>
> This caused by temporarily cleared PTE during a read/modify/write update
> of the PTE, eg, do_numa_page()/change_pte_range().
>
> For the data segment of the user-mode program, the global variable area
> is a private mapping. After the pagecache is loaded, the private anonymous
> page is generated after the COW is triggered. Mlockall can lock COW pages
> (anonymous pages), but the original file pages cannot be locked and may
> be reclaimed. If the global variable (private anon page) is accessed when
> vmf->pte is zeroed in numa fault, a file page fault will be triggered.
>
> At this time, the original private file page may have been reclaimed.
> If the page cache is not available at this time, a major fault will be
> triggered and the file will be read, causing additional overhead.
>
> Fix this by rechecking the PTE without acquiring PTL in filemap_fault()
> before triggering a major fault.
>
> Testing file anonymous page read and write page fault performance in ext4
> and ramdisk using will-it-scale[2] on a x86 physical machine. The data
> is the average change compared with the mainline after the patch is
> applied. The test results are within the range of fluctuation, and there
> is no obvious difference. The test results are as follows:
> processes processes_idle threads threads_idle
> ext4 file write: -1.14% -0.08% -1.87% 0.13%
> ext4 file read: 0.03% -0.65% -0.51% -0.08%
> ramdisk file write: -1.21% -0.21% -1.12% 0.11%
> ramdisk file read: 0.00% -0.68% -0.33% -0.02%
IIUC, this is the regression test results. Right? Can you also show
improvement test results to justify the change?
--
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/9e62fd9a-bee0-52bf-50a7-498fa17434ee@huawei.com/
> [2] https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale/
>
> Suggested-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
> RFC->v1:
> - Add error handling when ptep == NULL per Huang, Ying and Matthew Wilcox
> - Check the PTE without acquiring PTL in filemap_fault(), suggested by
> Huang, Ying and Yin Fengwei
> - Add pmd_none() check before PTE map
> - Update commit message and add performance test information
>
> mm/filemap.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 142864338ca4..b29cdeb6a03b 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -3238,6 +3238,24 @@ vm_fault_t filemap_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> mapping_locked = true;
> }
> } else {
> + if (!pmd_none(*vmf->pmd)) {
> + pte_t *ptep;
> +
> + ptep = pte_offset_map_nolock(vmf->vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd,
> + vmf->address, &vmf->ptl);
> + if (unlikely(!ptep))
> + return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> + /*
> + * Recheck pte as the pte can be cleared temporarily
> + * during a read/modify/write update.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!pte_none(ptep_get_lockless(ptep))))
> + ret = VM_FAULT_NOPAGE;
> + pte_unmap(ptep);
> + if (unlikely(ret))
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> /* No page in the page cache at all */
> count_vm_event(PGMAJFAULT);
> count_memcg_event_mm(vmf->vma->vm_mm, PGMAJFAULT);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-05 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-04 9:35 Peng Zhang
2024-02-05 2:54 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2024-02-05 6:42 ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-02-05 2:56 ` Huang, Ying
2024-02-05 6:43 ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-02-05 6:52 ` Huang, Ying
2024-02-05 7:24 ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-02-05 7:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-02-05 7:36 ` zhangpeng (AS)
2024-02-05 8:40 ` Yin Fengwei
2024-02-06 3:08 ` zhangpeng (AS)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874jen4o43.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=zhangpeng362@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox