From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
yanxiaofeng <yanxiaofeng@inspur.com>,
Changsheng Liu <liuchangsheng@inspur.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] memory-hotplug: add automatic onlining policy for the newly added memory
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 11:53:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8737v2vf4g.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56713D17.1080002@huawei.com> (Xishi Qiu's message of "Wed, 16 Dec 2015 18:29:43 +0800")
Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> writes:
> On 2015/12/16 17:17, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>
>> Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 2015/12/16 2:05, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Currently, all newly added memory blocks remain in 'offline' state unless
>>>> someone onlines them, some linux distributions carry special udev rules
>>>> like:
>>>>
>>>> SUBSYSTEM=="memory", ACTION=="add", ATTR{state}=="offline", ATTR{state}="online"
>>>>
>>>> to make this happen automatically. This is not a great solution for virtual
>>>> machines where memory hotplug is being used to address high memory pressure
>>>> situations as such onlining is slow and a userspace process doing this
>>>> (udev) has a chance of being killed by the OOM killer as it will probably
>>>> require to allocate some memory.
>>>>
>>>> Introduce default policy for the newly added memory blocks in
>>>> /sys/devices/system/memory/hotplug_autoonline file with two possible
>>>> values: "offline" (the default) which preserves the current behavior and
>>>> "online" which causes all newly added memory blocks to go online as
>>>> soon as they're added.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
>>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>>>> Cc: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
>>>> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>> Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>>>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>>> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
>>>> Cc: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>> Cc: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com>
>>>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
>>>> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> - I was able to find previous attempts to fix the issue, e.g.:
>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137425951924598&w=2
>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=127186488905382
>>>> but I'm not completely sure why it didn't work out and the solution
>>>> I suggest is not 'smart enough', thus 'RFC'.
>>>
>>> + CC:
>>> yanxiaofeng@inspur.com
>>> liuchangsheng@inspur.com
>>>
>>> Hi Vitaly,
>>>
>>> Why not use udev rule? I think it can online pages automatically.
>>>
>>
>> Two main reasons:
>> 1) I remember someone saying "You never need a mouse in order to add
>> another mouse to the kernel" -- but we we need memory to add more
>> memory. Udev has a chance of being killed by the OOM killer as
>> performing an action will probably require to allocate some
>> memory. Other than that udev actions are generally slow compared to what
>> we can do in kernel.
>
> Hi Vitaly,
>
> So why we add memory when there is almost no free memory left?
> I think the administrator should add memory when the free memory is low
> or he should do something to stop free memory become worse.
I have virtual machines use-case in my mind where hypervisor adds new
memory on high memory pressure reports from the guest (e.g. Hyper-V
behaves like that). This is an automatic action.
>
>>
>> 2) I agree with Kay that '... unconditional hotplug loop through
>> userspace is absolutely pointless' (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/25/354).
>> (... and I should had add him to CC, adding now). Udev maintainers
>> refused to add a rule for unconditional memory onlining to udev and now
>> linux distros have to carry such custom rules.
>>
>
> If the administrator don't know how to config the udev, he could use sysfs
> (echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/node/nodeXX/memoryXX/online) to online it,
> or write a script to do this.
Oh, no, I'm not taking about manual actions here. My suggestion doesn't
eliminate this possibility and it doesn't even change the default --
memory blocks stay in 'offline' state unless someone requests the
auto-online policy.
--
Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-16 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-15 18:05 Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-12-15 22:56 ` Daniel Kiper
2015-12-16 9:25 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-12-16 3:19 ` Xishi Qiu
2015-12-16 9:17 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-12-16 10:29 ` Xishi Qiu
2015-12-16 10:53 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8737v2vf4g.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.kiper@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kay@vrfy.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=liuchangsheng@inspur.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=qiuxishi@huawei.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=yanxiaofeng@inspur.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox