linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,  <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
	 Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>,
	 Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com>,
	 stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, THP, swap: fix allocating cluster for swapfile by mistake
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:36:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rk2x7bb.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200819195613.24269-1-hsiangkao@redhat.com> (Gao Xiang's message of "Thu, 20 Aug 2020 03:56:13 +0800")

Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com> writes:

> SWP_FS doesn't mean the device is file-backed swap device,
> which just means each writeback request should go through fs
> by DIO. Or it'll just use extents added by .swap_activate(),
> but it also works as file-backed swap device.
>
> So in order to achieve the goal of the original patch,
> SWP_BLKDEV should be used instead.
>
> FS corruption can be observed with SSD device + XFS +
> fragmented swapfile due to CONFIG_THP_SWAP=y.
>
> Fixes: f0eea189e8e9 ("mm, THP, swap: Don't allocate huge cluster for file backed swap device")
> Fixes: 38d8b4e6bdc8 ("mm, THP, swap: delay splitting THP during swap out")
> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@redhat.com>

Good catch!  The fix itself looks good me!  Although the description is
a little confusing.

After some digging, it seems that SWP_FS is set on the swap devices
which make swap entry read/write go through the file system specific
callback (now used by swap over NFS only).

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

> ---
>
> I reproduced the issue with the following details:
>
> Environment:
> QEMU + upstream kernel + buildroot + NVMe (2 GB)
>
> Kernel config:
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_NVME=y
> CONFIG_THP_SWAP=y
>
> Some reproducable steps:
> mkfs.xfs -f /dev/nvme0n1
> mkdir /tmp/mnt
> mount /dev/nvme0n1 /tmp/mnt
> bs="32k"
> sz="1024m"    # doesn't matter too much, I also tried 16m
> xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -R -b $bs 0 $sz" -c "fdatasync" /tmp/mnt/sw
> xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -R -b $bs 0 $sz" -c "fdatasync" /tmp/mnt/sw
> xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -R -b $bs 0 $sz" -c "fdatasync" /tmp/mnt/sw
> xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -F -S 0 -b $bs 0 $sz" -c "fdatasync" /tmp/mnt/sw
> xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -R -b $bs 0 $sz" -c "fsync" /tmp/mnt/sw
>
> mkswap /tmp/mnt/sw
> swapon /tmp/mnt/sw
>
> stress --vm 2 --vm-bytes 600M   # doesn't matter too much as well
>
> Symptoms:
>  - FS corruption (e.g. checksum failure)
>  - memory corruption at: 0xd2808010
>  - segfault
>  ... 
>
>  mm/swapfile.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c
> index 6c26916e95fd..2937daf3ca02 100644
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@ int get_swap_pages(int n_goal, swp_entry_t swp_entries[], int entry_size)
>  			goto nextsi;
>  		}
>  		if (size == SWAPFILE_CLUSTER) {
> -			if (!(si->flags & SWP_FS))
> +			if (si->flags & SWP_BLKDEV)
>  				n_ret = swap_alloc_cluster(si, swp_entries);
>  		} else
>  			n_ret = scan_swap_map_slots(si, SWAP_HAS_CACHE,


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-20  4:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-19 19:56 Gao Xiang
2020-08-19 20:05 ` Andrew Morton
2020-08-19 20:15   ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-19 21:41     ` Yang Shi
2020-08-20  1:24       ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-19 20:44   ` Rafael Aquini
2020-08-19 20:54     ` Gao Xiang
2020-08-20  4:36 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2020-08-20  4:41   ` Gao Xiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871rk2x7bb.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aquini@redhat.com \
    --cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=hsiangkao@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox