From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, willy@infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm, compaction: Skip all non-migratable pages during scan
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 16:47:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qji7zhm.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230512190000.103737-1-khalid.aziz@oracle.com> (Khalid Aziz's message of "Fri, 12 May 2023 13:00:00 -0600")
Hi, Khalid,
Cced Mel.
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> writes:
> Pages pinned in memory through extra refcounts can not be migrated.
> Currently as isolate_migratepages_block() scans pages for
> compaction, it skips any pinned anonymous pages. All non-migratable
> pages should be skipped and not just the anonymous pinned pages.
> This patch adds a check for extra refcounts on a page to determine
> if the page can be migrated. This was seen as a real issue on a
> customer workload where a large number of pages were pinned by vfio
> on the host and any attempts to allocate hugepages resulted in
> significant amount of cpu time spent in either direct compaction or
> in kcompatd scanning vfio pinned pages over and over again that can
s/kcompatd/kcompactd/
> not be migrated.
With the patch below, the cycles for kcompactd disappeared?
> Signed-off-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>
> Suggested-by: Steve Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
> Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2:
> - Update comments in the code (Suggested by Andrew)
> - Use PagePrivate() instead of page_has_private() (Suggested
> by Matthew)
> - Pass mapping to page_has_extrarefs() (Suggested by Matthew)
> - Use page_ref_count() (Suggested by Matthew)
> - Rename is_pinned_page() to reflect its function more
> accurately (Suggested by Matthew)
>
> mm/compaction.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 5a9501e0ae01..837f20df2bbb 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -764,6 +764,34 @@ static bool too_many_isolated(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> return too_many;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Check if this base page should be skipped from isolation because
> + * it has extra refcounts that will prevent it from being migrated.
> + * This function is called for regular pages only, and not
> + * for THP or hugetlbfs pages. This code is inspired by similar code
> + * in migrate_vma_check_page(), can_split_folio() and
> + * folio_migrate_mapping()
> + */
> +static inline bool page_has_extrarefs(struct page *page,
Better to be named as page_has_extra_refs()?
> + struct address_space *mapping)
> +{
> + unsigned long extra_refs;
> +
> + /* anonymous page can have extra ref from swap cache */
> + if (mapping)
> + extra_refs = 1 + PagePrivate(page);
> + else
> + extra_refs = PageSwapCache(page) ? 1 : 0;
IIUC, mapping != NULL if PageSwapCache(page) is true. Please check the
implementation of page_mapping().
And even if mapping == NULL, the extra_refs should be 1, because we have
elevated the page refcount in isolate_migratepages_block() before
checking whether the page is pinned. IIUC, this is the original
behavior. Or, we can add "- 1" in the following checking.
> +
> + /*
> + * This is an admittedly racy check but good enough to determine
> + * if a page is pinned and can not be migrated
> + */
> + if ((page_ref_count(page) - extra_refs) > page_mapcount(page))
> + return true;
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * isolate_migratepages_block() - isolate all migrate-able pages within
> * a single pageblock
> @@ -992,12 +1020,12 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
> goto isolate_fail;
>
> /*
> - * Migration will fail if an anonymous page is pinned in memory,
> - * so avoid taking lru_lock and isolating it unnecessarily in an
> - * admittedly racy check.
> + * Migration will fail if a page has extra refcounts
> + * preventing it from migrating, so avoid taking
> + * lru_lock and isolating it unnecessarily
> */
> mapping = page_mapping(page);
> - if (!mapping && (page_count(page) - 1) > total_mapcount(page))
> + if (page_has_extrarefs(page, mapping))
> goto isolate_fail_put;
>
> /*
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-15 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-12 19:00 Khalid Aziz
2023-05-15 8:47 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2023-05-15 22:36 ` Khalid Aziz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871qji7zhm.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=khalid@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox