From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/10] selftests/mm: Skip gup_longerm tests on weird filesystems
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 22:19:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86f91949-9972-4b0f-903e-cfa36bcd9926@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9RRkL1hom48z3Tt@google.com>
On 14.03.25 16:56, Brendan Jackman wrote:
>>> Even if it's a bug in QEMU, I think it is worth working around this
>>> one way or another. QEMU by far the most practical way to run these
>>> tests, and virtme-ng is probably the most popular/practical way to do
>>> that.
>>
>> I'm afraid yes. Although allocating temp files form 9pfs is rather ...
>> weird. :) One would assume that /tmp is usually backed by tmpfs. But well, a
>> disto can do what it wants.
>
> Ah yeah but these tests also use mkstemp() in the CWD i.e. the
> location of run_vmtests.sh, it isn't /tmp that is causing this at the
> moment. (At some point I thought I was hitting the issue there too,
> but I think I was mistaken, like just not reading the test logs
> properly or something).
Ah, yes run_with_local_tmpfile() ... jep, I wrote that test, now my
memory comes back; we wanted to test with actual filesystems (e.g.,
ext4, xfs) easily.
>
>>> I think even if we are confident it's just a bunch of broken
>>> code that isn't even in Linux, it's pragmatic to spend a certain
>>> amount of energy on having green tests there.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, we're trying ...
>>
>>> (Also, this f_type thing might be totally intentional specified
>>> filesystem behaviour, I don't know).
>>
>> I assume it's broken in various ways to mimic that you are a file system
>> which you are not.
>>
>> Your approach is likely the easiest approach to deal with this 9pfs crap.
>>
>> Can you document in the code+description better what we learned, and why we
>> cannot even trust f_type with crappy 9pfs?
>
> Sure, I will be more verbose about it.
>
> I've already sent v4 here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250311-mm-selftests-v4-7-dec210a658f5@google.com/
>
> So I will wait and see if there are any comments on the v4, if there
> are I'll spin the extra commentary into v5 otherwise send it as a
> followup, does that sound OK?
You can just ask Andrew to fixup the comment or description in a reply
to the v4 patch. Andrew will let you know if he prefers a resend.
Thanks!
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-14 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 16:54 [PATCH v3 00/10] selftests/mm: Some cleanups from trying to run them Brendan Jackman
2025-02-28 16:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] selftests/mm: Report errno when things fail in gup_longterm Brendan Jackman
2025-02-28 17:17 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-06 9:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-02-28 16:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] selftests/mm: Skip uffd-stress if userfaultfd not available Brendan Jackman
2025-02-28 17:20 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-28 16:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] selftests/mm: Skip uffd-wp-mremap " Brendan Jackman
2025-02-28 17:25 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-03 10:48 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-03 11:00 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-28 16:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] selftests/mm/uffd: Rename nr_cpus -> nr_threads Brendan Jackman
2025-02-28 17:36 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-03 9:47 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-03 10:18 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-03 10:34 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-03 10:46 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-28 16:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] selftests/mm: Print some details when uffd-stress gets bad params Brendan Jackman
2025-02-28 17:26 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-28 16:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] selftests/mm: Don't fail uffd-stress if too many CPUs Brendan Jackman
2025-02-28 17:37 ` Dev Jain
2025-03-05 11:07 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-02-28 16:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] selftests/mm: Skip map_populate on weird filesystems Brendan Jackman
2025-02-28 16:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] selftests/mm: Skip gup_longerm tests " Brendan Jackman
2025-03-06 9:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-06 12:42 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-06 14:40 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-11 13:00 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-11 19:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-12 8:34 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-14 12:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-14 12:17 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-03-14 15:56 ` Brendan Jackman
2025-03-14 21:19 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-02-28 16:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] selftests/mm: Drop unnecessary sudo usage Brendan Jackman
2025-02-28 17:26 ` Dev Jain
2025-02-28 16:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] selftests/mm: Ensure uffd-wp-mremap gets pages of each size Brendan Jackman
2025-03-05 8:25 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] selftests/mm: Some cleanups from trying to run them Muhammad Usama Anjum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86f91949-9972-4b0f-903e-cfa36bcd9926@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox