From: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
To: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kho: simplify page initialization in kho_restore_page()
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 21:52:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <868qel9fje.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+CK2bBv2wpduYQF_fwzciH4HxZ6eFjwZMSpZwW0AC6KXL4msg@mail.gmail.com> (Pasha Tatashin's message of "Tue, 23 Dec 2025 12:49:39 -0500")
On Tue, Dec 23 2025, Pasha Tatashin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 5:45 AM Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> When restoring a page (from kho_restore_pages()) or folio (from
>> kho_restore_folio()), KHO must initialize the struct page. The
>> initialization differs slightly depending on if a folio is requested or
>> a set of 0-order pages is requested.
>>
>> Conceptually, it is quite simple to understand. When restoring 0-order
>> pages, each page gets a refcount of 1 and that's it. When restoring a
>> folio, head page gets a refcount of 1 and tail pages get 0.
>>
>> kho_restore_page() tries to combine the two separate initialization flow
>> into one piece of code. While it works fine, it is more complicated to
>> read than it needs to be. Make the code simpler by splitting the two
>> initalization paths into two separate functions. This improves
>> readability by clearly showing how each type must be initialized.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>
>> Notes:
>> This patch is a follow up from
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/86ms42mj44.fsf@kernel.org/
>>
>> kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
>> index 2d9ce33c63dc..304c26fd5ee6 100644
>> --- a/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
>> +++ b/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c
>> @@ -219,11 +219,33 @@ static int __kho_preserve_order(struct kho_mem_track *track, unsigned long pfn,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/* For physically contiguous 0-order pages. */
>> +static void kho_init_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int nr_pages)
>
> Here and in other places below, it is better for nr_pages to be
> unsigned long. This is consistent with other places in mm, where we
> have gradually moved on from int/unsigned int to unsigned long for
> npages (see gup.c for example). Otherwise, LGTM.
Thanks. Will do.
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-29 20:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-23 10:44 Pratyush Yadav
2025-12-23 17:49 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-12-29 20:52 ` Pratyush Yadav [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=868qel9fje.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox