From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
upstream+pagemap@sigma-star.at, adobriyan@gmail.com,
wangkefeng wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
ryan roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
hughd@google.com, peterx@redhat.com, avagin@google.com,
lstoakes@gmail.com, vbabka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
usama anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] pagemap.rst: Document write bit
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:10:57 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <861682210.23281.1709809857201.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db29666a-32b8-4bf6-ab13-7de3b09b0da1@redhat.com>
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>
> An: "richard" <richard@nod.at>, "linux-mm" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
>> + Bit 58 is useful to detect CoW mappings; however, it does not indicate
>> + whether the page mapping is writable or not. If an anonymous mapping is
>> + writable but the write bit is not set, it means that the next write access
>> + will cause a page fault, and copy-on-write will happen.
>
> That is not true.
Can you please help me correct my obvious misunderstanding?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-07 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-06 23:23 [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] proc: pagemap: Expose whether a PTE is writable Richard Weinberger
2024-03-06 23:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] pagemap.rst: Document write bit Richard Weinberger
2024-03-07 10:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-07 11:10 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2024-03-07 11:15 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-10 22:14 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2024-03-07 10:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] [RFC] proc: pagemap: Expose whether a PTE is writable Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-03-07 10:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-07 11:10 ` Richard Weinberger
2024-03-07 11:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-07 11:51 ` Richard Weinberger
2024-03-07 11:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-07 12:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2024-03-07 14:42 ` Richard Weinberger
2024-03-10 21:55 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=861682210.23281.1709809857201.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=avagin@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=upstream+pagemap@sigma-star.at \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox