linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pintu Agarwal <pintu_agarwal@yahoo.com>
To: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	"Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	azurIt <azurit@pobox.sk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regarding memory fragmentation using malloc....
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:24:56 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <858878.89812.qm@web162015.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.vtxb92f73l0zgt@mnazarewicz-glaptop>

Hello Mr. Michal,

Thanks for your comments.
Sorry. There was a small typo in my last sentence (mitigating not *migitating* memory fragmentation)
That means how can I measure the memory fragmentation either from user space or from kernel space.
Is there a way to measure the amount of memory fragmentation in linux?
Can you provide me some references for that?


Thanks,
Pintu



--- On Thu, 4/14/11, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> wrote:

> From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
> Subject: Re: Regarding memory fragmentation using malloc....
> To: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, "Pintu Agarwal" <pintu_agarwal@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, "Changli Gao" <xiaosuo@gmail.com>, "Jiri Slaby" <jslaby@suse.cz>, "azurIt" <azurit@pobox.sk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, April 14, 2011, 5:47 AM
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:44:50 +0200,
> Pintu Agarwal <pintu_agarwal@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > As I can understand from your comments that, malloc
> from user space will not have much impact on memory
> fragmentation.
> 
> It has an impact, just like any kind of allocation, it just
> don't care about
> fragmentation of physical memory.  You can have only
> 0-order pages and
> successfully allocate megabytes of memory with malloc().
> 
> > Will the memory fragmentation be visible if I do
> kmalloc from
> > the kernel module????
> 
> It will be more visible in the sense that if you allocate 8
> KiB, kernel will
> have to find 8 KiB contiguous physical memory (ie. 1-order
> page).
> 
> >> No.  When you call malloc() only virtual
> address space is allocated.
> >> The actual allocation of physical space occurs
> when user space accesses
> >> the memory (either reads or writes) and it happens
> page at a time.
> > 
> > Here, if I do memset then I am accessing the
> memory...right? That I am doing already in my sample
> program.
> 
> Yes.  But note that even though it's a single memset()
> call, you are
> accessing page at a time and kernel is allocating page at a
> time.
> 
> On some architectures (not ARM) you could access two pages
> with a single
> instructions but I think that would result in two page
> faults anyway.  I
> might be wrong though, the details are not important
> though.
> 
> >> what really happens is that kernel allocates the
> 0-order
> >> pages and when
> >> it runs out of those, splits a 1-order page into
> two
> >> 0-order pages and
> >> takes one of those.
> > 
> > Actually, if I understand buddy allocator, it
> allocates pages from top to bottom.
> 
> No.  If you want to allocate a single 0-order page,
> buddy looks for a
> a free 0-order page.  If one is not found, it will
> look for 1-order page
> and split it.  This goes up till buddy reaches
> (MAX_ORDER-1)-page.
> 
> > Is the memory fragmentation is always a cause of the
> kernel space program and not user space at all?
> 
> Well, no.  If you allocate memory in user space,
> kernel will have to
> allocate physical memory and *every* allocation may
> contribute to
> fragmentation.  The point is, that all allocations
> from user-space are
> single-page allocations even if you malloc() MiBs of
> memory.
> 
> > Can you provide me with some references for migitating
> memory fragmentation in linux?
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean by that.
> 
> --Best regards,           
>                
>              _ 
>    _
> .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of   
>   o' \,=./ `o
> ..o | Computer Science,  Michal "mina86"
> Nazarewicz    (o o)
> ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@google.com>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm'
> in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. 
> For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org">
> email@kvack.org
> </a>
>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-14 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20110315132527.130FB80018F1@mail1005.cent>
     [not found] ` <20110317001519.GB18911@kroah.com>
     [not found]   ` <20110407120112.E08DCA03@pobox.sk>
2011-04-07 10:19     ` Regression from 2.6.36 Jiri Slaby
2011-04-07 11:21       ` Américo Wang
2011-04-07 11:57         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 12:13           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 15:27             ` Changli Gao
2011-04-07 15:36               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 22:49                 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-13  1:23                   ` Changli Gao
2011-04-13  1:31                     ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-13  2:37                       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-13  6:54                         ` Regarding memory fragmentation using malloc Pintu Agarwal
2011-04-13 11:44                           ` Américo Wang
2011-04-13 13:56                             ` Pintu Agarwal
2011-04-13 15:25                               ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-14  6:44                                 ` Pintu Agarwal
2011-04-14 10:47                                   ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-14 12:24                                     ` Pintu Agarwal [this message]
2011-04-14 12:31                                       ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-13 21:16                         ` Regression from 2.6.36 Andrew Morton
2011-04-13 21:24                           ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-19 19:29                             ` azurIt
2011-04-19 19:55                               ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-13 21:44                           ` David Rientjes
2011-04-13 21:54                             ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-14  2:10                           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14  5:28                             ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-14  6:31                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14  9:08                                 ` azurIt
2011-04-14 10:27                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 10:31                                     ` azurIt
2011-04-14 10:25                           ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15  9:59                             ` azurIt
2011-04-15 10:47                               ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15 10:56                                 ` azurIt
2011-04-15 11:17                                   ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15 11:36                                     ` azurIt
2011-04-15 13:01                                       ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15 13:21                                         ` azurIt
2011-04-15 14:15                                           ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-08 12:25               ` azurIt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=858878.89812.qm@web162015.mail.bf1.yahoo.com \
    --to=pintu_agarwal@yahoo.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=azurit@pobox.sk \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mina86@mina86.com \
    --cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox