From: Pintu Agarwal <pintu_agarwal@yahoo.com>
To: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Michal Nazarewicz" <mina86@mina86.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
azurIt <azurit@pobox.sk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Regarding memory fragmentation using malloc....
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:24:56 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <858878.89812.qm@web162015.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <op.vtxb92f73l0zgt@mnazarewicz-glaptop>
Hello Mr. Michal,
Thanks for your comments.
Sorry. There was a small typo in my last sentence (mitigating not *migitating* memory fragmentation)
That means how can I measure the memory fragmentation either from user space or from kernel space.
Is there a way to measure the amount of memory fragmentation in linux?
Can you provide me some references for that?
Thanks,
Pintu
--- On Thu, 4/14/11, Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> wrote:
> From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
> Subject: Re: Regarding memory fragmentation using malloc....
> To: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>, "Pintu Agarwal" <pintu_agarwal@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, "Changli Gao" <xiaosuo@gmail.com>, "Jiri Slaby" <jslaby@suse.cz>, "azurIt" <azurit@pobox.sk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, April 14, 2011, 5:47 AM
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:44:50 +0200,
> Pintu Agarwal <pintu_agarwal@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > As I can understand from your comments that, malloc
> from user space will not have much impact on memory
> fragmentation.
>
> It has an impact, just like any kind of allocation, it just
> don't care about
> fragmentation of physical memory. You can have only
> 0-order pages and
> successfully allocate megabytes of memory with malloc().
>
> > Will the memory fragmentation be visible if I do
> kmalloc from
> > the kernel module????
>
> It will be more visible in the sense that if you allocate 8
> KiB, kernel will
> have to find 8 KiB contiguous physical memory (ie. 1-order
> page).
>
> >> No. When you call malloc() only virtual
> address space is allocated.
> >> The actual allocation of physical space occurs
> when user space accesses
> >> the memory (either reads or writes) and it happens
> page at a time.
> >
> > Here, if I do memset then I am accessing the
> memory...right? That I am doing already in my sample
> program.
>
> Yes. But note that even though it's a single memset()
> call, you are
> accessing page at a time and kernel is allocating page at a
> time.
>
> On some architectures (not ARM) you could access two pages
> with a single
> instructions but I think that would result in two page
> faults anyway. I
> might be wrong though, the details are not important
> though.
>
> >> what really happens is that kernel allocates the
> 0-order
> >> pages and when
> >> it runs out of those, splits a 1-order page into
> two
> >> 0-order pages and
> >> takes one of those.
> >
> > Actually, if I understand buddy allocator, it
> allocates pages from top to bottom.
>
> No. If you want to allocate a single 0-order page,
> buddy looks for a
> a free 0-order page. If one is not found, it will
> look for 1-order page
> and split it. This goes up till buddy reaches
> (MAX_ORDER-1)-page.
>
> > Is the memory fragmentation is always a cause of the
> kernel space program and not user space at all?
>
> Well, no. If you allocate memory in user space,
> kernel will have to
> allocate physical memory and *every* allocation may
> contribute to
> fragmentation. The point is, that all allocations
> from user-space are
> single-page allocations even if you malloc() MiBs of
> memory.
>
> > Can you provide me with some references for migitating
> memory fragmentation in linux?
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by that.
>
> --Best regards,
>
> _
> _
> .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of
> o' \,=./ `o
> ..o | Computer Science, Michal "mina86"
> Nazarewicz (o o)
> ooo +-----<email/xmpp: mnazarewicz@google.com>-----ooO--(_)--Ooo--
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm'
> in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org.
> For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org">
> email@kvack.org
> </a>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-14 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20110315132527.130FB80018F1@mail1005.cent>
[not found] ` <20110317001519.GB18911@kroah.com>
[not found] ` <20110407120112.E08DCA03@pobox.sk>
2011-04-07 10:19 ` Regression from 2.6.36 Jiri Slaby
2011-04-07 11:21 ` Américo Wang
2011-04-07 11:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 12:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-07 15:27 ` Changli Gao
2011-04-07 15:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-12 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-13 1:23 ` Changli Gao
2011-04-13 1:31 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-13 2:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-13 6:54 ` Regarding memory fragmentation using malloc Pintu Agarwal
2011-04-13 11:44 ` Américo Wang
2011-04-13 13:56 ` Pintu Agarwal
2011-04-13 15:25 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-14 6:44 ` Pintu Agarwal
2011-04-14 10:47 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-14 12:24 ` Pintu Agarwal [this message]
2011-04-14 12:31 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2011-04-13 21:16 ` Regression from 2.6.36 Andrew Morton
2011-04-13 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-19 19:29 ` azurIt
2011-04-19 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-13 21:44 ` David Rientjes
2011-04-13 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-14 2:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 5:28 ` Andrew Morton
2011-04-14 6:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 9:08 ` azurIt
2011-04-14 10:27 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-04-14 10:31 ` azurIt
2011-04-14 10:25 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15 9:59 ` azurIt
2011-04-15 10:47 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15 10:56 ` azurIt
2011-04-15 11:17 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15 11:36 ` azurIt
2011-04-15 13:01 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-15 13:21 ` azurIt
2011-04-15 14:15 ` Mel Gorman
2011-04-08 12:25 ` azurIt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=858878.89812.qm@web162015.mail.bf1.yahoo.com \
--to=pintu_agarwal@yahoo.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=azurit@pobox.sk \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mina86@mina86.com \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox