Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Converge on using secs_to_jiffies()

[Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>]

Le 15/11/2024 à 22:29, Easwar Hariharan a écrit :
> [Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de eahariha@linux.microsoft.com. Découvrez pourquoi ceci est important à https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> 
> On 11/15/2024 1:26 PM, Easwar Hariharan wrote:
>> This is a series that follows up on my previous series to introduce
>> secs_to_jiffies() and convert a few initial users.[1] In the review for
>> that series, Anna-Maria requested converting other users with
>> Coccinelle. This is part 1 that converts users of msecs_to_jiffies()
>> that use the multiply pattern of either of:
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*1000), or
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(N*MSEC_PER_SEC)
>>
>> The entire conversion is made with Coccinelle in the script added in
>> patch 2. Some changes suggested by Coccinelle have been deferred to
>> later parts that will address other possible variant patterns.
>>
>> CC: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha@linux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> [1] https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Fall%2F20241030-open-coded-timeouts-v3-0-9ba123facf88%40linux.microsoft.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7Cff4857ad28a74e7051f708dd05bc8d45%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638673029556700628%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=q%2FHm%2Fal%2FBtK5J4nd%2BqJHNeSJ3f%2B0lVCKzigUUoL2vjw%3D&reserved=0
>> [2] https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Fall%2F8734kngfni.fsf%40somnus%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7Cff4857ad28a74e7051f708dd05bc8d45%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638673029556721028%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PZiR%2B9GSo3Zk7cD85MyM4ZpqvIQtD0lSxd4G1gZ4UFE%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - EDITME: describe what is new in this series revision.
>> - EDITME: use bulletpoints and terse descriptions.
>> - Link to v1: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.kernel.org%2Fr%2F20241115-converge-secs-to-jiffies-v1-0-19aadc34941b%40linux.microsoft.com&data=05%7C02%7Cchristophe.leroy%40csgroup.eu%7Cff4857ad28a74e7051f708dd05bc8d45%7C8b87af7d86474dc78df45f69a2011bb5%7C0%7C0%7C638673029556732854%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NXdY%2FTuSufEPcy4ijIj%2F0%2BW3K%2FhkLs2JGu5C1WFMPOM%3D&reserved=0
>>
> 
> Apologies, I missed out on editing the changelog here. v1 included a
> patch that's already been accepted, there are no other changes in v2.

You should refrain from sending such a patch bomb twice in 4 minutes. If 
there is no other change you could have just replied to that already 
included patch to say so.

In any case wait a few days so that people have time to review and 
provide comments.

Christophe