From: <leonid.moiseichuk@nokia.com>
To: penberg@kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cesarb@cesarb.net, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
emunson@mgebm.net, aarcange@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com,
mel@csn.ul.ie, rientjes@google.com, dima@android.com,
rebecca@android.com, san@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
vesa.jaaskelainen@nokia.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 0/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device and related changes in MM
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:02:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84FF21A720B0874AA94B46D76DB9826904554391@008-AM1MPN1-003.mgdnok.nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOJsxLEdTMB6JtYViRJq5gZ4_w5aaV18S3q-1rOXGzaMtmiW6A@mail.gmail.com>
Well, mm/notify.c seems a bit global for me. At the first step I handle inputs from Greg and try to find less destructive approach to allocation tracking rather than page_alloc.
The issue is I know quite well my problem, so other guys who needs memory tracking has own requirements how account memory, how often notify/which granularity,
how many clients could be and so one. If I get some inputs I will be happy to implement them.
With Best Wishes,
Leonid
-----Original Message-----
From: penberg@gmail.com [mailto:penberg@gmail.com] On Behalf Of ext Pekka Enberg
Sent: 05 January, 2012 14:41
To: Moiseichuk Leonid (Nokia-MP/Helsinki)
Cc: gregkh@suse.de; linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; cesarb@cesarb.net; kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com; emunson@mgebm.net; aarcange@redhat.com; riel@redhat.com; mel@csn.ul.ie; rientjes@google.com; dima@android.com; rebecca@android.com; san@google.com; akpm@linux-foundation.org; Jaaskelainen Vesa (Nokia-MP/Helsinki)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 0/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device and related changes in MM
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 1:47 PM, <leonid.moiseichuk@nokia.com> wrote:
> As I understand AOOM it wait until situation is reached bad conditions
> which required memory reclaiming, selects application according to
> free memory and oom_adj level and kills it. So no intermediate levels could be checked (e.g.
> 75% usage), nothing could be done in user-space to prevent killing,
> no notification for case when memory becomes OK.
>
> What I try to do is to get notification in any application that memory
> becomes low, and do something about it like stop processing data,
> close unused pages or correctly shuts applications, daemons.
> Application(s) might have necessity to install several notification
> levels, so reaction could be adjusted based on current utilization
> level per each application, not globally.
Sure. However, from VM point of view, both have the exact same
functionality: detect when we reach low memory condition (for some configurable threshold) and notify userspace or kernel subsystem about it.
That's the part I'd like to see implemented in mm/notify.c or similar.
I really don't care what Android or any other folks use it for exactly as long as the generic code is light-weight, clean, and we can reasonably assume that distros can actually enable it.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-05 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-04 17:21 Leonid Moiseichuk
2012-01-04 17:21 ` [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 1/3] Making si_swapinfo exportable Leonid Moiseichuk
2012-01-04 17:21 ` [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 2/3] MM hook for page allocation and release Leonid Moiseichuk
2012-01-04 20:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-05 6:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-05 11:26 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-05 12:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-05 15:05 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-05 15:17 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-05 15:22 ` Mel Gorman
2012-01-04 17:21 ` [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 3/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device module Leonid Moiseichuk
2012-01-04 19:55 ` Greg KH
2012-01-09 9:58 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-09 10:09 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-09 10:19 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-09 20:55 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-11 12:46 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-11 21:44 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-12 8:32 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-12 20:54 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-13 9:34 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-13 11:06 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-13 11:51 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-13 21:35 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-04 19:56 ` [PATCH 3.2.0-rc1 0/3] Used Memory Meter pseudo-device and related changes in MM Greg KH
2012-01-04 20:17 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-04 20:42 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-05 23:01 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-05 12:22 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-05 11:47 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-05 12:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-05 13:02 ` leonid.moiseichuk [this message]
2012-01-05 14:57 ` Greg KH
2012-01-05 16:13 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-05 23:10 ` David Rientjes
2012-01-09 8:27 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-06 0:26 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2012-01-09 8:49 ` leonid.moiseichuk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84FF21A720B0874AA94B46D76DB9826904554391@008-AM1MPN1-003.mgdnok.nokia.com \
--to=leonid.moiseichuk@nokia.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cesarb@cesarb.net \
--cc=dima@android.com \
--cc=emunson@mgebm.net \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rebecca@android.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=san@google.com \
--cc=vesa.jaaskelainen@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox