From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 251436B00BC for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:25:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so269102fgg.4 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:25:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090216184200.GA31264@csn.ul.ie> References: <20090123154653.GA14517@wotan.suse.de> <200902041748.41801.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20090204152709.GA4799@csn.ul.ie> <200902051459.30064.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20090216184200.GA31264@csn.ul.ie> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:25:35 +0200 Message-ID: <84144f020902161125r59de8a53nfe01566d20ff1658@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator (try 2) From: Pekka Enberg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Mel Gorman Cc: Nick Piggin , Nick Piggin , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Lin Ming , "Zhang, Yanmin" , Christoph Lameter List-ID: Hi Mel, On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > Slightly later than hoped for, but here are the results of the profile > run between the different slab allocators. It also includes information on > the performance on SLUB with the allocator pass-thru logic reverted by commit > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=97a4871761e735b6f1acd3bc7c3bac30dae3eab9 Did you just cherry-pick the patch or did you run it with the topic/slub/perf branch? There's a follow-up patch from Yanmin which will make a difference for large allocations when page-allocator pass-through is reverted: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/penberg/slab-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=79b350ab63458ef1d11747b4f119baea96771a6e Pekka -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org