From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id s2so260992uge for ; Wed, 02 May 2007 12:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <84144f020705021218v7ab2461ala215bbb034475e07@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 22:18:55 +0300 From: "Pekka Enberg" Subject: Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans: slub In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070430162007.ad46e153.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070501125559.9ab42896.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070502115725.683ac702.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , haveblue@ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On 5/2/07, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Owww... You throw my roadmap out of the window and may create too > high expectations of SLUB. Me too! On 5/2/07, Christoph Lameter wrote: > I am the one who has to maintain SLAB and SLUB it seems and I have been > dealing with the trio SLAB, SLOB and SLUB for awhile now. Its okay and it > will be much easier once the cleanups are in. And then there's patches such as kmemleak which would need to target all three. Plus it doesn't really make sense for users to select between three competiting implementations. Please don't take away our high hopes of getting rid of mm/slab.c Christoph =) Pekka -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org