From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@sw.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
devel@openvz.org, Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Show slab memory usage on OOM and SysRq-M
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:22:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84144f020704170622h2b16f0f6m47ffdbb3b5686758@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4624C3C1.9040709@sw.ru>
Hi,
On 4/17/07, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@sw.ru> wrote:
> The out_of_memory() function and SysRq-M handler call
> show_mem() to show the current memory usage state.
>
> This is also helpful to see which slabs are the largest
> in the system.
Makes sense.
On 4/17/07, Pavel Emelianov <xemul@sw.ru> wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
> index 21b3c61..9a5829a 100644
> --- a/mm/slab.c
> +++ b/mm/slab.c
> @@ -749,6 +749,7 @@ static inline void init_lock_keys(void)
> * 2. Protect sanity of cpu_online_map against cpu hotplug events
> */
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(cache_chain_mutex);
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cache_chain_lock);
So, now we have two locks protecting cache_chain? Please explain why
you can't use the mutex.
> +static unsigned long get_cache_size(struct kmem_cache *cachep)
> +{
> + unsigned long slabs;
> + struct kmem_list3 *l3;
> + struct list_head *lh;
> + int node;
> +
> + slabs = 0;
> +
> + for_each_online_node (node) {
> + l3 = cachep->nodelists[node];
> + if (l3 == NULL)
> + continue;
> +
> + spin_lock(&l3->list_lock);
> + list_for_each (lh, &l3->slabs_full)
> + slabs++;
> + list_for_each (lh, &l3->slabs_partial)
> + slabs++;
> + list_for_each (lh, &l3->slabs_free)
> + slabs++;
> + spin_unlock(&l3->list_lock);
> + }
> +
> + return slabs * ((PAGE_SIZE << cachep->gfporder) +
> + (OFF_SLAB(cachep) ? cachep->slabp_cache->buffer_size : 0));
> +}
Considering you're doing this at out_of_memory() time, wouldn't it
make more sense to add a ->nr_pages to struct kmem_cache and do the
tracking in kmem_getpages/kmem_freepages?
I would also drop the OFF_SLAB bits because it really doesn't matter
that much for your purposes. Besides, you're already per-node and
per-CPU caches here which attribute to much more memory on NUMA setups
for example.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-17 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-17 12:55 Pavel Emelianov
2007-04-17 13:22 ` Pekka Enberg [this message]
2007-04-17 13:50 ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-04-17 14:02 ` Pekka J Enberg
2007-04-17 14:21 ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-04-17 15:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-18 6:17 ` Pekka J Enberg
2007-04-18 12:07 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84144f020704170622h2b16f0f6m47ffdbb3b5686758@mail.gmail.com \
--to=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dev@openvz.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xemul@sw.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox