From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
oliver.sang@intel.com, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm/mempolicy: Correctly update prev when policy is equal on mbind
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2023 16:07:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83f1d612acb519d777bebf7f3359317c4e7f4265.1682866629.git.lstoakes@gmail.com> (raw)
The refactoring in commit f4e9e0e69468 ("mm/mempolicy: fix use-after-free
of VMA iterator") introduces a subtle bug which arises when attempting to
apply a new NUMA policy across a range of VMAs in mbind_range().
The refactoring passes a **prev pointer to keep track of the previous VMA
in order to reduce duplication, and in all but one case it keeps this
correctly updated.
The bug arises when a VMA within the specified range has an equivalent
policy as determined by mpol_equal() - which unlike other cases, does not
update prev.
This can result in a situation where, later in the iteration, a VMA is
found whose policy does need to change. At this point, vma_merge() is
invoked with prev pointing to a VMA which is before the previous VMA.
Since vma_merge() discovers the curr VMA by looking for the one immediately
after prev, it will now be in a situation where this VMA is incorrect and
the merge will not proceed correctly.
This is checked in the VM_WARN_ON() invariant case with end > curr->vm_end,
which, if a merge is possible, results in a warning (if CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is
specified).
I note that vma_merge() performs these invariant checks only after
merge_prev/merge_next are checked, which is debatable as it hides this
issue if no merge is possible even though a buggy situation has arisen.
The solution is simply to update the prev pointer even when policies are
equal.
This caused a bug to arise in the 6.2.y stable tree, and this patch
resolves this bug.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202304292203.44ddeff6-oliver.sang@intel.com
Fixes: f4e9e0e69468 ("mm/mempolicy: fix use-after-free of VMA iterator")
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
---
v2: updated to correctly cc the stable list :)
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/db42467a692d78c654ec5c1953329401bd8a9c34.1682859234.git.lstoakes@gmail.com
mm/mempolicy.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 2068b594dc88..1756389a0609 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -808,8 +808,10 @@ static int mbind_range(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
vmstart = vma->vm_start;
}
- if (mpol_equal(vma_policy(vma), new_pol))
+ if (mpol_equal(vma_policy(vma), new_pol)) {
+ *prev = vma;
return 0;
+ }
pgoff = vma->vm_pgoff + ((vmstart - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
merged = vma_merge(vmi, vma->vm_mm, *prev, vmstart, vmend, vma->vm_flags,
--
2.40.1
reply other threads:[~2023-04-30 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83f1d612acb519d777bebf7f3359317c4e7f4265.1682866629.git.lstoakes@gmail.com \
--to=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox