From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [davidhildenbrand:fork_rmap_batching_mm_unstable 104/141] make[4]: *** No rule to make target 'kernel/elfcorehdr.o', needed by 'kernel/built-in.a'.
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 14:52:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83d5e5c2-6e3b-466a-aaae-78cd23b4d3c7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZbespUe8SwF7L3g2@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
On 29.01.24 14:48, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 01/29/24 at 08:12pm, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Baoquan,
>>
>> First bad commit (maybe != root cause):
>>
>> tree: https://github.com/davidhildenbrand/linux fork_rmap_batching_mm_unstable
>> head: b652ec55c236cca5d0247cf66864971cc2ffea2d
>> commit: 21b8f7d4d9d70fec7ff6bbd973e485fa1226b156 [104/141] crash: remove dependency of FA_DUMP on CRASH_DUMP
>> compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240129/202401292018.RTtZWk0P-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>>
>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401292018.RTtZWk0P-lkp@intel.com/
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> ......
>>>> make[4]: *** No rule to make target 'kernel/elfcorehdr.o', needed by 'kernel/built-in.a'.
>
> This is fixed by Stephen at bottom. Now I can see it on linux-next:
>
Yes, thanks for the note (note that this branch was based on
mm-unstable, not linux-next directly), I spotted that yesterday as well
and got my builds going again. I think it's fixed in mm-unstable today
as well.
It's weird that the build bot sometimes only sends stuff related to my
WIP github branches to only me, but sometimes it decides to CC the MM
mailing list.
Anyhow, that ahead-of-submit buildbot runs on my branches is absolutely
fantastic, independent of who else gets CCed. (I still do cross-compiles
for weird architectures, but at least this way I get fast feedback for
the more common architectures)
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-29 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 12:12 kernel test robot
2024-01-29 13:48 ` Baoquan He
2024-01-29 13:52 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83d5e5c2-6e3b-466a-aaae-78cd23b4d3c7@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox